From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6E2C433E0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE72A22BF3 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=aepfle.de header.i=@aepfle.de header.b="KYLbhsH7" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EE72A22BF3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=aepfle.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k1TxH-0004tW-Lq; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:16:07 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k1TxF-0004tQ-RQ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:16:06 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 9a438646-d327-11ea-abaa-12813bfff9fa Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (unknown [85.215.255.20]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 9a438646-d327-11ea-abaa-12813bfff9fa; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:16:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1596197763; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=aepfle.de; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=oDJV2Te/0euogOizTXwWSecv1vZ4GMrGg4ZiS8EsREo=; b=KYLbhsH7kjTdDC568+VGQiE/yk60Q1FfUuwTSB+NTePepQ/dmELlf9t9E9z+O1ww8f +DbRk07X2nJZc//GhP99RFW7lBF1ikNeLpbWJibP044sNA6UX1/g6t7GfO0xafv4Vzwn NtsqGLnR27v71vq+5qG68N2AIVEadEbmeAhGVosuvWM2XDgoG1I5WBfs0NkPNUwtzWif hwowt4LYflbZFFTwqLHzlPUTPGVki3N+IQIzsSUQ9wfkcu5OTm5/ltDnpZJMCtXZIfmk vBYfXdF4lUZDgda2A9+KTubdOnXiXxwoxJxxAGHoAo9n7B3pFY8XzAwOWf4tyyRfgkTY Y1jg== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P2EQZWCpfu+qG7CngxMFH1J+3q8wa/QLpd5ylWvMDXdoX8l8pYAcz5OTUoY=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from sender by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 46.10.5 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id m032cfw6VCFuGc8 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:15:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:15:49 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] tools/xen-cpuid: show enqcmd Message-ID: <20200731141549.476fa255.olaf@aepfle.de> In-Reply-To: <6e467a8f-d727-8511-da56-69901b6ada85@citrix.com> References: <20200730163406.31020-1-olaf@aepfle.de> <65317ac2-0dd0-b453-caec-e5529b423d95@suse.com> <6e467a8f-d727-8511-da56-69901b6ada85@citrix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2020.07.13 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/NjE1vwMdWZYH7_MxQQ==ZYN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ian Jackson , Wei Liu , Jan Beulich , Roger Pau =?UTF-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" --Sig_/NjE1vwMdWZYH7_MxQQ==ZYN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:04:35 +0100 schrieb Andrew Cooper : > And in particular, probably missing from libxl_cpuid.c, which I was > meaning to check when I've got a free moment. Will a ever domU see this flag? I just spotted the <29> when comparing 'xen= -cpuid' output between recent Xen releases. It shows up just in the 'Known'= section at this point. Olaf --Sig_/NjE1vwMdWZYH7_MxQQ==ZYN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE97o7Um30LT3B+5b/86SN7mm1DoAFAl8kC3UACgkQ86SN7mm1 DoBEChAAjZiHJJXd54LUe7zxcGGRVgnK027bclYSllWE6aKaqkcj4OiY1+Du0cVe LS81x/7elDpixrco/svlPwkHJ561665eg8piyBfHMzyQ5Wa/5gLsCuviiDlkhx0j lThje92/56YLgU0na6OHa3tFxfv7IpThLw7MPHnW9VHcrQbxcJMHJBtGwuxkES4F jf2NoKG6FAgu4D2Ref32K1BATc/H/odd3Q1Uar45Y/Bwy3RSq77GXFlcjgALLE7U 1O1sgZJsInv/Uv0F2vh520LJ5j5tT71z4GnVjzhquSJ39SLsllEK+X2gCTAPlQps KZRDsjWLqgO6AeS4k5tkCCwxqn2aWF9F1tUUxpN3ISMxdiSCDY9MB2bnbtxnqKNg G3dmIgotuB6EFMeQ0H0+dnJFwKl9MtSnlH4aKNWtrq/ZwNaHlozDFUf5mx982B7H 3kBrAH1z43bTX8GxuJ0rGBzHx9kVHHNouQORzTJtVqykfHBPZhBHGZ2nwzO79Jm8 vGpK3gkT+Is04QRRwNWpkda2erve6LDgwcqO3vveTru79G2tM1m/I1ClguEvou8f Xj9FM8vnFbWhesOHQURxpCBoK8rMsQxOmA6eE66LrF+EiazwT9r8A7yf5x9eC9FJ uoasYS7y6/CeSvqrRQMZ6ngTpQhowOrZv1+bsHnCQMhcqrkdDi0= =RrXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NjE1vwMdWZYH7_MxQQ==ZYN--