All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i2c-tools] i2ctransfer: add support for I2C_M_RECV_LEN
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 10:38:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200803083823.GA958@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C82A0A94-A06B-4D42-B71B-F14D48D5E029@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1049 bytes --]


> > I have just checked existing I2C_M_RECV_LEN handling. Quite some drivers
> > do it wrong. And there is no consistency in what they return. Lots of
> > things to fix there...
> 
> Would be curious about what variants are there.

1) some do it correctly
2) some hardcode the new length as recv_len + 1 (or recv_len + 2
   if they think about PEC). But they don't do extra_bytes + recv_len
3) some don't touch msg->len at all
4) some also remove the flag I2C_M_RECV_LEN while processing
5) one driver always sets length to I2C_SMBUS_MAX_BLOCK_LEN no matter
   what the device responds

...maybe more, but I gave up.

> Note that msgs[i].len isn’t updated, you only get <extra_bytes> of data back,
> so the difference would be severe: msgs[i].len is what guides copy_to_user().

I think you can clearly see what was actually tested and what was coded
after the specs without proper testing (or maybe just kernel-space
testing?). This is why I hope my slave-testunit helps a little by
providing a device to test against.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-03  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-02 19:28 [PATCH i2c-tools] i2ctransfer: add support for I2C_M_RECV_LEN Wolfram Sang
2020-08-02 20:28 ` Daniel Stodden
2020-08-02 21:38   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03  7:30     ` Daniel Stodden
2020-08-03  8:38       ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-08-03 20:25         ` Daniel Stodden
2020-08-03 20:45           ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 19:14 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200803083823.GA958@kunai \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=daniel.stodden@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.