From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h:19:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'hub_data'
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 22:49:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200803194910.GC72435@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202008040108.xTarUIe8%lkp@intel.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:39:14AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head: bcf876870b95592b52519ed4aafcf9d95999bc9c
> commit: 397dc00e249ec64e106374565575dd0eb7e25998 mips: sgi-ip27: switch from DISCONTIGMEM to SPARSEMEM
> date: 10 months ago
> config: mips-randconfig-r032-20200803 (attached as .config)
> compiler: mips64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> git checkout 397dc00e249ec64e106374565575dd0eb7e25998
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=mips
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from arch/mips/include/asm/topology.h:11,
> from include/linux/topology.h:36,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:9,
> from include/linux/slab.h:15,
> from include/linux/crypto.h:19,
> from include/crypto/hash.h:11,
> from include/linux/uio.h:10,
> from include/linux/socket.h:8,
> from include/linux/compat.h:15,
> from arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h:25:39: error: 'MAX_COMPACT_NODES' undeclared here (not in a function)
> 25 | extern unsigned char __node_distances[MAX_COMPACT_NODES][MAX_COMPACT_NODES];
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/topology.h: In function 'numa_node_id':
> >> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h:16:27: error: implicit declaration of function 'cputonasid' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 16 | #define cpu_to_node(cpu) (cputonasid(cpu))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
This happens when randconfig disables NUMA and has SGI_IP27 enabled.
Before switch from discontigmem to sparsemem, there always was
CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES=y because it was selected by DISCONTIGMEM.
Without DISCONTIGMEM it is possible to have SPARSEMEM without NUMA for
SGI_IP27 and as many things there rely on custom node definition, the
build breaks.
I don't remember small Origin or Onyx systems so I think it would be
reasonable to make SGI_IP27 to select NUMA. If the below patch makes
sense I'll resend it formally.
diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig
index 6fee1a133e9d..a7e40bb1e5bc 100644
--- a/arch/mips/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig
@@ -678,6 +678,7 @@ config SGI_IP27
select SYS_SUPPORTS_NUMA
select SYS_SUPPORTS_SMP
select MIPS_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_7
+ select NUMA
help
This are the SGI Origin 200, Origin 2000 and Onyx 2 Graphics
workstations. To compile a Linux kernel that runs on these, say Y
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-03 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-03 17:39 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h:19:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'hub_data' kernel test robot
2020-08-03 17:39 ` kernel test robot
2020-08-03 19:49 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2020-08-03 23:58 ` Joshua Kinard
2020-08-04 11:34 ` Jiaxun Yang
2020-08-04 12:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-08-04 12:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-08-05 8:37 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-27 15:00 kernel test robot
2020-07-27 15:00 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-15 6:20 kernel test robot
2020-06-15 6:20 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-13 13:20 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200803194910.GC72435@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.