All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Meneghini, John" <John.Meneghini@netapp.com>
Cc: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Hannes de <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: nvme-core: fix io interrupt when work with dm-multipah
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:40:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200806184057.GA27858@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E3390A8E-D582-47BA-A085-21663D883365@netapp.com>

On Thu, Aug 06 2020 at 12:17pm -0400,
Meneghini, John <John.Meneghini@netapp.com> wrote:

> On 8/6/20, 11:59 AM, "Meneghini, John" <John.Meneghini@netapp.com> wrote:
> 
>     Maybe translate to
>     >> BLK_STS_IOERR is also not suitable, we should translate
>     >> NVME_SC_CMD_INTERRUPTED to BLK_STS_AGAIN.
> 
> I think this depends upon what the error handling is up the stack for BLK_STS_IOERR.
> 
> What does DM do with BLK_STS_IOERR?

DM treats it as retryable.  See blk_path_error().

>     > BLK_STS_AGAIN is a bad choice as we use it for calls that block when
>     > the callers asked for non-blocking submission.  I'm really not sure
>     > we want to change anything here - the error definition clearly states
>     > it is not a failure but a request to retry later.
> 
> So it sounds like you may need a new BLK_STS error.   However, even if you add
> a new error, that's not going to be enough to communicate the CRDT or DNR 
> information up the stack.
>  
> } blk_errors[] = {
>         [BLK_STS_OK]            = { 0,          "" },
>         [BLK_STS_NOTSUPP]       = { -EOPNOTSUPP, "operation not supported" },
>         [BLK_STS_TIMEOUT]       = { -ETIMEDOUT, "timeout" },
>         [BLK_STS_NOSPC]         = { -ENOSPC,    "critical space allocation" },
>         [BLK_STS_TRANSPORT]     = { -ENOLINK,   "recoverable transport" },
>         [BLK_STS_TARGET]        = { -EREMOTEIO, "critical target" },
>         [BLK_STS_NEXUS]         = { -EBADE,     "critical nexus" },
>         [BLK_STS_MEDIUM]        = { -ENODATA,   "critical medium" },
>         [BLK_STS_PROTECTION]    = { -EILSEQ,    "protection" },
>         [BLK_STS_RESOURCE]      = { -ENOMEM,    "kernel resource" },
>         [BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE]  = { -EBUSY,     "device resource" },
>         [BLK_STS_AGAIN]         = { -EAGAIN,    "nonblocking retry" },
> 
>         /* device mapper special case, should not leak out: */
>         [BLK_STS_DM_REQUEUE]    = { -EREMCHG, "dm internal retry" },
> 
>         /* everything else not covered above: */
>         [BLK_STS_IOERR]         = { -EIO,       "I/O" },
> };
> 

We've yet to determine how important it is that the target provided
delay information be honored...

In any case, NVMe translating NVME_SC_CMD_INTERRUPTED to BLK_STS_TARGET
is definitely wrong.  That conveys the error is not retryable (see
blk_path_error()).

Shouldn't NVMe translate NVME_SC_CMD_INTERRUPTED to BLK_STS_RESOURCE or
BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE?

DM will retry immediately if BLK_STS_RESOURCE is returned.
DM will delay a fixed 100ms if BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE is used.

(Ming said BLK_STS_RESOURCE isn't Linux specific and can be used by
drivers)


_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-06 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-27  5:58 [PATCH] nvme-core: fix io interrupt when work with dm-multipah Chao Leng
2020-07-28 11:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-29  2:54   ` Chao Leng
2020-07-29  5:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-30  1:49       ` Chao Leng
2020-08-05  6:40         ` Chao Leng
2020-08-05 15:29           ` Keith Busch
2020-08-06  5:52             ` Chao Leng
2020-08-06 14:26               ` Keith Busch
2020-08-06 15:59                 ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-06 16:17                   ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-06 18:40                     ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-08-06 19:19                       ` [PATCH] nvme: restore use of blk_path_error() in nvme_complete_rq() Mike Snitzer
2020-08-06 22:42                         ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-07  0:07                           ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-07  0:07                             ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-07  1:21                             ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-07  1:21                               ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-07  4:50                               ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-07  4:50                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-07 23:35                                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-07 23:35                                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-08 21:08                                   ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-08 21:08                                     ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-08 21:11                                     ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-08 21:11                                       ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-10 14:48                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-10 14:48                                         ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-11 12:54                                         ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-11 12:54                                           ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-10  8:10                                     ` Chao Leng
2020-08-10  8:10                                       ` Chao Leng
2020-08-11 12:36                                       ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-11 12:36                                         ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-12  7:51                                         ` Chao Leng
2020-08-12  7:51                                           ` Chao Leng
2020-08-10 14:36                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-10 14:36                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-10 17:22                                     ` [PATCH] nvme: explicitly use normal NVMe error handling when appropriate Mike Snitzer
2020-08-10 17:22                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-11  3:32                                       ` Chao Leng
2020-08-11  3:32                                         ` Chao Leng
2020-08-11  4:20                                         ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-11  4:20                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-11  6:17                                           ` Chao Leng
2020-08-11  6:17                                             ` Chao Leng
2020-08-11 14:12                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-11 14:12                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-13 14:48                                       ` [RESEND PATCH] " Mike Snitzer
2020-08-13 14:48                                         ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-13 15:29                                         ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-13 15:29                                           ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-13 15:43                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-13 15:43                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-13 15:59                                             ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-13 15:59                                               ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-13 15:36                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-13 15:36                                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-13 17:47                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-13 17:47                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-13 18:43                                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-13 18:43                                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-13 19:03                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-13 19:03                                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-14  4:26                                               ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-14  4:26                                                 ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-14  6:53                                               ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-14  6:53                                                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-14  6:55                                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-14  6:55                                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-14  7:02                                                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-14  7:02                                                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-14  3:23                                         ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-14  3:23                                           ` Meneghini, John
2020-08-07  0:44                         ` [PATCH] nvme: restore use of blk_path_error() in nvme_complete_rq() Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-10 12:43                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-10 15:06                           ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-11  3:45                           ` [PATCH] " Chao Leng
2020-08-07  0:03                   ` [PATCH] nvme-core: fix io interrupt when work with dm-multipah Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-07  2:28                     ` Chao Leng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200806184057.GA27858@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=John.Meneghini@netapp.com \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.