From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] bpf: verifier check for dead branch
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:14:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811071438.GC699846@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4abe45b-2c80-9448-677c-e352f0ecb24e@fb.com>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:16:12AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
SNIP
>
> Thanks for the test case. I can reproduce the issue. The following
> is why this happens in llvm.
> the pseudo IR code looks like
> data = skb->data
> data_end = skb->data_end
> comp = data + 42 > data_end
> ip = select "comp" nullptr "data + some offset"
> <=== select return one of nullptr or "data + some offset" based on
> "comp"
> if comp // original skb_shorter condition
> ....
> ...
> = ip
>
> In llvm, bpf backend "select" actually inlined "comp" to generate proper
> control flow. Therefore, comp is computed twice like below
> data = skb->data
> data_end = skb->data_end
> if (data + 42 > data_end) {
> ip = nullptr; goto block1;
> } else {
> ip = data + some_offset;
> goto block2;
> }
> ...
> if (data + 42 > data_end) // original skb_shorter condition
>
> The issue can be workarounded the source. Just check data + 42 > data_end
> and if failure return. Then you will be able to assign
> a value to "ip" conditionally.
is the change below what you mean? it produces the same code for me:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier-cond-repro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier-cond-repro.c
index 2f11027d7e67..9c401bd00ab7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier-cond-repro.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier-cond-repro.c
@@ -41,12 +41,10 @@ static INLINE struct iphdr *get_iphdr (struct __sk_buff *skb)
struct ethhdr *eth;
if (skb_shorter(skb, ETH_IPV4_UDP_SIZE))
- goto out;
+ return NULL;
eth = (void *)(long)skb->data;
ip = (void *)(eth + 1);
-
-out:
return ip;
}
I also tried this one:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier-cond-repro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier-cond-repro.c
index 2f11027d7e67..00ff06fe6fdd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier-cond-repro.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier-cond-repro.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int my_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
__u8 proto = 0;
if (!(ip = get_iphdr(skb)))
- goto out;
+ return -1;
proto = ip->protocol;
it did just slight change in generated code - added 'w0 = -1'
before the second condition
>
> Will try to fix this issue in llvm12 as well.
> Thanks!
great, could you please CC me on the changes?
thanks a lot!
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-11 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-07 17:30 [RFC] bpf: verifier check for dead branch Jiri Olsa
2020-08-10 1:21 ` Yonghong Song
2020-08-10 13:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-08-10 17:16 ` Yonghong Song
2020-08-11 7:14 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-08-11 16:08 ` Yonghong Song
2020-08-12 7:48 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200811071438.GC699846@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.