From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=64.147.123.20; helo=wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=NgF4tmaF; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=aXiEbzCI; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BSxsM2y0jzDqRr for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 07:48:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F09F4E6; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:48:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=/VOQ6d7oBg8tT9tNvtQBqGf5LUj l8muTJOC26kS1J4w=; b=NgF4tmaFEx5bw4B6nHDT85P+Kc39TYRoRumJz8ZTo+f aSFDMfin/9guR+FjnVv5JwPS4ZHq1Jyet7PaMDoyWaqo7ByxSiPBWlV4Ls+6dLGZ FrvF9vB5BX0b96GgILSZCdyOERTiWMqfzQ+X7oMIWR2kyNntLW/dBcpi3pSixDU/ cM3S8mBxLBX0JcfGwkr4tL2KKlKXQXMCbjyxPJSVvMbtTju+gZVMzP0+454oKWY7 4L8xSt/vTv6/tpeggqKX69C63b/pKKlcNsoBb0MdUJPwf/M6oYQ5D+1p6h0XrWAn TFvgnEaUrAC6t+akSPjXeamHdQsLz0JLgZOwIQUjNUA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=/VOQ6d 7oBg8tT9tNvtQBqGf5LUjl8muTJOC26kS1J4w=; b=aXiEbzCIa83KQzFEcZ1e1o oOjCxXTHsNJZjaKnGwL5kcjJWpB+oTN2Wcxw/zJeSiI4Dd7zhuqbTQHkc8kBNGfV k3WF0o4uzC8lY3MrybgYHwPARhlDuABCkp2orYIoIEwRMD8U2qPu38Gy6zZbXaT/ PNccXTDEZhSzInUS9goPzgfp1D5dVufZsbuWl9bh9XHm2vcCTs6f99cVMnlMOGG6 7dHffDIWMTGEn360PV+JjGrTzDKlyqNDnLReZkuPI/xZvTF2G4wmTxGdIAKP8VhJ X9P6BLsCS13wFgOUDV9OB++BZkuUKrwE339ToGSjO/SPQOn3RiJq1541eroQrmsg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrleekgddtfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehprghtrhhitghksehsth iftgigrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegheehfeffgeekveehtdfhgfduhfeg fefgtdehhfektdelffevkefgueffhedtieenucfkphepuddtjedrledvrdeitddrudelne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgrthhr ihgtkhesshhtfigtgidrgiihii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (mobile-107-92-60-19.mycingular.net [107.92.60.19]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 33BCF3280063; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:48:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:48:44 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: TOM JOSEPH Cc: OpenBMC Maillist , anoo@us.ibm.com, Brad Bishop , benjaminfair@google.com, "Mauery, Vernon" Subject: Re: IPMI implementation of Get Device ID command Message-ID: <20200814214844.GD1675275@heinlein> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 21:48:59 -0000 --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:04:45PM +0530, TOM JOSEPH wrote: > How are other companies converting their arbitrary tag formats to IPMI=20 > firmware revision fields? Does every company maintain their own=20 > downstream implementation of this command? I'm not sure if this is helpful but our current tagging format is: v.. - ex. v2020.33.0 I don't think we have code now that creates this field from the tagging though. --=20 Patrick Williams --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAl83BrsACgkQqwNHzC0A wRng6Q/+J+yelmIq7qhtSJnxDYcmLUxffydTzm6tYAZyTQDsmAnkkQiavxTwN0v7 jKvreCbqBDhPfx1abCwggo4jIKBBXox4Gref/T2I7DSzsZwCQZXrIurUn5kaYkE6 nlEQBqS4mqi6px9uQ9Yya8syIM40DwmzR8g5B46SKMegDuw/m2gra2maB8oue63P 2eOOBVJkgQpgvmRSrFgEPulWSMLdAwRZ08ID1y2dgzxIqD1SHQkqb5poeN9JA89O pSzegeH4zLzjaTmdlrOiuxxd8vW1HmU/+Ths+biLsoDis88JXrvyXLaznJkj1R7l z2B4hfGUholwCdZdeZWQTkjVc79vMUPOeyAVL+dl2ReGrAAPuEtoYhLasveaxST1 3XCI40iRZGrcIypjFTxPFHEe6UdSGIJ/b3ZZBdrdo7zdNn76hPoKDKqLnUtynZ5u PENWvrzxD2ZKOG6G9ueUYSpBW3z0xBrA826Q06BA9GyfIRZbND6FfRtHpSeNzNcS EDyp36SHNO0yGaOLLSjJTBfg0sUxWgdZM1x0RjZj8Drb3JLjs4ckJ0to/uI2iNbD R4lDkc4UdqMKs+eYEkcQbjEyevNMdst86rBq9xfU58N0/eOvLyf8b0ed28cyeNYn DN0X11ES1mIMFPTUWTB1kUMRJDFm9CVhWFeGxnWHykdQakDmPYQ= =Lf5N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0--