On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:52:13PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> > Julia,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 14 2020 at 21:00, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >> That's clearly a false positive. Is there anything what can be done to
> > >> help that cocci script here?
> > >
> > > I have a better version that needs to get pushed.
> > >
> > > But normally these pass through me.  Did you get it directly from kbuild?
> >
> > Yes, because I touched the affected lines last :)
> 
> Actually, that's not the point.  Normally, I get all the reports on this
> case, and then I forward them if they look ok.  If I forwarded something
> incorrect, then sorry about that.  If the policy has changed for this rule
> to be sending the reports out directlty to the recipients, then I think it
> should be changed back.  There are a lot of real bugs with lock usage, but
> there are alot of false positives too.  Specifically, the rule looks for
> the case with identical if tests, but only when the branches are identical
> too.
> 
> Kbuild people, can this be adjusted?  Or have I misunderstood the
> situation?
Hi Julia and Thomas, pls allow us to check this further, usually all cocci
reports will be sent to kbuild(a)01.org for Julia to check. But there maybe
something wrong with this report. We will check the detail in next week as
we have server maintainance during the weekend.

> 
> thanks,
> julia
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave(a)lists.01.org