[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] syscalls/sigsuspend01.c: Convert to the new API

[Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>]

Hi!
Pushed with a few fixes, thanks.

> +static void setup(void)
>  {
> +	struct sigaction sa_new;
>  
> +	SAFE_SIGEMPTYSET(&signalset);
> +	SAFE_SIGEMPTYSET(&sigset1);
> +	SAFE_SIGADDSET(&sigset1, SIGALRM);
> +
> +	sa_new.sa_handler = sig_handler;
> +	SAFE_SIGACTION(SIGALRM, &sa_new, 0);

Here you were passing random data to the sigaction() function, as the
sa_new was created on a stack and only sa_handler was set.

Which, for instance, breaks the test in a case of the -i 2 option, since
if you were unlucky the SA_RESETHAND was set in the sa_new and the
signal handler was uninstalled after the first signal was handled and
the test process was killed by SIGALRM when the signal arrived for a
second time.

In short there was all kind of mess passed down the call, on strace it
looked as:

[pid 3245] rt_sigaction(SIGALRM, {sa_handler=0x557469b59c20, sa_mask=[HUP INT QUIT ILL ABRT USR1 ALRM TERM CHLD TSTP TTOU URG VTALRM PROF WINCH PWR SYS RT_1 RT_2 RT_3 RT_4 RT_6 RT_10 RT_12 RT_13 RT_14 RT_18 RT_20 RT_21 RT_22], sa_flags=SA_RESTORER|SA_ONSTACK|SA_RESTART|SA_NODEFER|SA_RESETHAND|0xe9e4e8, sa_restorer=0x7f26dc368b40}, NULL, 8) = 0

So I changed it to:

	struct sigaction sa_new = {
		.sa_handler = sig_handler
	};

Which will clears the rest of the structure.

> +	/* Block SIGALRM */
> +	SAFE_SIGPROCMASK(SIG_SETMASK, &sigset1, NULL);
>  }
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.setup = setup,
> +	.test_all = verify_sigsuspend,
> +};

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz