From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nvme: refactor command completion
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:28:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817192859.GA31161@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200817081544.837699-3-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Aug 17 2020 at 4:15am -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> Lift all the code to decide the dispostition of a completed command
> from nvme_complete_rq and nvme_failover_req into a new helper, which
> returns an emum of the potential actions. nvme_complete_rq then
> just switches on those and calls the proper helper for the action.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 47 ++++++----------------
> drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 31 ++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 88cff309d8e4f0..8d474adad721fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -241,17 +241,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_error_status(u16 status)
> }
> }
>
> -static inline bool nvme_req_needs_retry(struct request *req)
> -{
> - if (blk_noretry_request(req))
> - return false;
> - if (nvme_req(req)->status & NVME_SC_DNR)
> - return false;
> - if (nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries)
> - return false;
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> static void nvme_retry_req(struct request *req)
> {
> struct nvme_ns *ns = req->q->queuedata;
> @@ -268,34 +257,67 @@ static void nvme_retry_req(struct request *req)
> blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list(req->q, delay);
> }
>
> -void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
> +enum nvme_disposition {
> + COMPLETE,
> + RETRY,
> + FAILOVER,
> +};
> +
> +static inline enum nvme_disposition nvme_decide_disposition(struct request *req)
> {
> - blk_status_t status = nvme_error_status(nvme_req(req)->status);
> + u16 status = nvme_req(req)->status & 0x7ff;
>
> - trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
> + if (likely(status == 0))
> + return COMPLETE;
>
> - nvme_cleanup_cmd(req);
> + if (blk_noretry_request(req) || (status & NVME_SC_DNR) ||
> + nvme_req(req)->retries >= nvme_max_retries)
> + return COMPLETE;
Looking just a bit closer, the above DNR test seems wrong because of the
0x7ff mask applied. That mask drops access to NVME_SC_DNR right?
Mike
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 8:15 nvme completion handling refactor and fix v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 8:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvme: rename and document nvme_end_request Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 14:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-17 8:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme: refactor command completion Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 15:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-17 19:28 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-08-18 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 8:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvme: just check the status code type in nvme_is_path_error Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 15:11 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-17 19:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-18 6:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 8:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: redirect commands on dying queue Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 15:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-08-18 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 18:10 ` nvme completion handling refactor and fix v2 Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-18 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-18 7:11 nvme completion handling refactor and fix v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 7:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme: refactor command completion Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200817192859.GA31161@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.