From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
Cc: zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, quintela@redhat.com,
linyilu@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.chen@huawei.com,
ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com, fangying1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:30:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820173009.GM2664@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597634433-18809-6-git-send-email-zhengchuan@huawei.com>
* Chuan Zheng (zhengchuan@huawei.com) wrote:
> Record hash results for each sampled page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YanYing Zhuang <ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com>
> ---
> migration/dirtyrate.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> migration/dirtyrate.h | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.c b/migration/dirtyrate.c
> index c4304ef..62b6f69 100644
> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.c
> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include "dirtyrate.h"
>
> CalculatingDirtyRateState CalculatingState = CAL_DIRTY_RATE_INIT;
> +static unsigned long int qcrypto_hash_len = QCRYPTO_HASH_LEN;
Why do we need this static rather than just using the QCRYPTO_HASH_LEN ?
It's never going to change is it?
(and anyway it's just a MD5 len?)
> static struct DirtyRateStat dirty_stat;
>
> static int dirty_rate_set_state(int new_state)
> @@ -71,6 +72,149 @@ static void update_dirtyrate(uint64_t msec)
> dirty_stat.dirty_rate = dirty_rate;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * get hash result for the sampled memory with length of 4K byte in ramblock,
> + * which starts from ramblock base address.
> + */
> +static int get_ramblock_vfn_hash(struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info,
> + unsigned long vfn, uint8_t **md)
> +{
> + struct iovec iov_array;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int nkey = 1;
> + size_t hash_len = qcrypto_hash_len;
> +
> + iov_array.iov_base = info->ramblock_addr +
> + vfn * DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE;
> + iov_array.iov_len = DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + if (qcrypto_hash_bytesv(QCRYPTO_HASH_ALG_MD5,
> + &iov_array, nkey,
> + md, &hash_len, NULL) < 0) {
> + ret = -1;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int save_ramblock_hash(struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info)
> +{
> + unsigned int sample_pages_count;
> + uint8_t *md = NULL;
> + int i;
> + int ret = -1;
> + GRand *rand = g_rand_new();
> +
> + sample_pages_count = info->sample_pages_count;
> +
> + /* ramblock size less than one page, return success to skip this ramblock */
> + if (unlikely(info->ramblock_pages == 0 || sample_pages_count == 0)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + info->hash_result = g_try_malloc0_n(sample_pages_count,
> + sizeof(uint8_t) * qcrypto_hash_len);
> + if (!info->hash_result) {
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + info->sample_page_vfn = g_try_malloc0_n(sample_pages_count,
> + sizeof(unsigned long));
> + if (!info->sample_page_vfn) {
> + g_free(info->hash_result);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sample_pages_count; i++) {
> + md = info->hash_result + i * qcrypto_hash_len;
> + info->sample_page_vfn[i] = g_rand_int_range(rand, 0,
> + info->ramblock_pages - 1);
> + ret = get_ramblock_vfn_hash(info, info->sample_page_vfn[i], &md);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + ret = 0;
> +
> +out:
> + g_rand_free(rand);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void get_ramblock_dirty_info(RAMBlock *block,
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info,
> + struct DirtyRateConfig *config)
> +{
> + uint64_t sample_pages_per_gigabytes = config->sample_pages_per_gigabytes;
> +
> + /* Right shift 30 bits to calc block size in GB */
> + info->sample_pages_count = (qemu_ram_get_used_length(block)
> + * sample_pages_per_gigabytes) >> 30;
> +
> + /* Right shift 12 bits to calc page count in 4KB */
> + info->ramblock_pages = qemu_ram_get_used_length(block) >> 12;
Is this really >> 12 ? Should it actually be
/ DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE ?
(and should you need that or just use TARGET_PAGE_SIZE?)
> + info->ramblock_addr = qemu_ram_get_host_addr(block);
> + strcpy(info->idstr, qemu_ram_get_idstr(block));
> +}
> +
> +static struct RamblockDirtyInfo *
> +alloc_ramblock_dirty_info(int *block_index,
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *block_dinfo)
> +{
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info = NULL;
> + int index = *block_index;
> +
> + if (!block_dinfo) {
> + block_dinfo = g_try_new(struct RamblockDirtyInfo, 1);
> + index = 0;
> + } else {
> + index++;
> + block_dinfo = g_try_realloc(block_dinfo, (index + 1) *
> + sizeof(struct RamblockDirtyInfo));
> + }
> + if (!block_dinfo) {
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + info = &block_dinfo[index];
> + memset(info, 0, sizeof(struct RamblockDirtyInfo));
> +
> + *block_index = index;
> + return block_dinfo;
> +}
> +
> +static int record_ramblock_hash_info(struct RamblockDirtyInfo **block_dinfo,
> + struct DirtyRateConfig config,
> + int *block_index)
> +{
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info = NULL;
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *dinfo = NULL;
> + RAMBlock *block = NULL;
> + int index = 0;
> +
> + RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_MIGRATABLE(block) {
> + dinfo = alloc_ramblock_dirty_info(&index, dinfo);
> + if (dinfo == NULL) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> + info = &dinfo[index];
> + get_ramblock_dirty_info(block, info, &config);
> + if (save_ramblock_hash(info) < 0) {
> + *block_dinfo = dinfo;
> + *block_index = index;
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + *block_dinfo = dinfo;
> + *block_index = index;
> +
> + return 0;
You should add some trace_ calls at various places to make this easier
to debug.
Dave
> +}
> +
> static void calculate_dirtyrate(struct DirtyRateConfig config)
> {
> /* todo */
> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.h b/migration/dirtyrate.h
> index af57c80..0812b16 100644
> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.h
> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.h
> @@ -20,10 +20,17 @@
> #define DIRTYRATE_DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PAGES 256
>
> /*
> + * Sample page size 4K as default.
> + */
> +#define DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE 4096
> +
> +/*
> * Record ramblock idstr
> */
> #define RAMBLOCK_INFO_MAX_LEN 256
>
> +#define QCRYPTO_HASH_LEN 16
> +
> /* Take 1s as default for calculation duration */
> #define DEFAULT_FETCH_DIRTYRATE_TIME_SEC 1
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-20 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 3:20 [PATCH v3 00/10] *** A Method for evaluating dirty page rate *** Chuan Zheng
2020-08-17 3:19 ` no-reply
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] migration/dirtyrate: Add get_dirtyrate_thread() function Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 16:11 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 9:59 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] migration/dirtyrate: Add RamlockDirtyInfo to store sampled page info Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 16:20 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 9:59 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-21 12:08 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] migration/dirtyrate: Add dirtyrate statistics series functions Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 16:28 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 9:59 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] migration/dirtyrate: move RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_MIGRATABLE into ram.h Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 16:31 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:30 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2020-08-20 17:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-20 17:55 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 12:22 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-21 12:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-21 12:39 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 13:07 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-22 6:25 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-24 8:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] migration/dirtyrate: Compare page hash results for recorded " Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:36 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 12:01 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-21 12:12 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] migration/dirtyrate: skip sampling ramblock with size below MIN_RAMBLOCK_SIZE Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:39 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] migration/dirtyrate: Implement get_sample_page_period() and block_sample_page_period() Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:52 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] migration/dirtyrate: Implement calculate_dirtyrate() function Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 9:59 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] migration/dirtyrate: Implement qmp_cal_dirty_rate()/qmp_get_dirty_rate() function Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:17 ` Eric Blake
2020-08-20 18:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 10:00 ` Zheng Chuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200820173009.GM2664@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.chen@huawei.com \
--cc=ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com \
--cc=fangying1@huawei.com \
--cc=linyilu@huawei.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengchuan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.