From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm : sync ra->ra_pages with bdi->ra_pages
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:57:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200821115744.GP17456@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGWkznGfc8g3SRd5vBq7sQGFLuc__98c7t21-3j4T1oAViHvgg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 05:31:52PM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> This patch has been verified on an android system and reduces 15% of
> UNITERRUPTIBLE_SLEEP_BLOCKIO which was used to be caused by wrong
> ra->ra_pages.
Wait, what? Readahead doesn't sleep on the pages it's requesting.
Unless ... your file access pattern is random, so you end up submitting
a readahead I/O that's bigger than needed, so takes longer for the page
you actually wanted to be returned. I know we have the LOTSAMISS
logic, but that's not really enough.
OK, assuming this problem is really about sync mmap (ie executables),
this makes a bit more sense. I think the real problem is here:
ra->start = max_t(long, 0, offset - ra->ra_pages / 2);
ra->size = ra->ra_pages;
ra->async_size = ra->ra_pages / 4;
ra_submit(ra, mapping, file);
which actually skips all the logic we have in ondemand_readahead()
for adjusting the readahead size. Ugh, this is a mess.
I think a quick fix to your problem will be just replacing ra->ra_pages
with bdi->ra_pages in do_sync_mmap_readahead() and leaving ra->ra_pages
alone everywhere else.
We need a smarter readahead algorithm for mmap'ed files, and I don't have
time to work on it right now. So let's stick to the same dumb algorithm,
but make it responsive to bdi ra_pages being reset.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-21 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-21 9:24 [PATCH v2] mm : sync ra->ra_pages with bdi->ra_pages Zhaoyang Huang
2020-08-21 9:31 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2020-08-21 11:57 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-08-22 1:46 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2020-08-25 1:25 ` Zhaoyang Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200821115744.GP17456@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
--cc=chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com \
--cc=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.