From: Roman Bolshakov <r.bolshakov@yadro.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] configure: Use discovered make for in-source build
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 01:07:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200824220755.GC41106@SPB-NB-133.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d4354b5-87bc-ee2b-a028-bc9e64baf4f0@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:37:07AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 8/22/20 4:21 PM, Roman Bolshakov wrote:
> > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ then
> > # This file is auto-generated by configure to support in-source tree
> > # 'make' command invocation
> > +include build/config-host.mak
>
> Should this use '-include' (also spelled 'sinclude'), to avoid halting the
> build if build/config-host.mak doesn't exist for whatever reason?
>
Sure I can do (and thanks for the noticed typos) but I tested that if
the build is interrupted too early (before Makefile is symlinked to
build directory but after GNUmakefile is created) it would fail even if
-include is used:
$ make
changing dir to build for /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make ""...
make[1]: Makefile: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `Makefile'. Stop.
changing dir to build for /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make ""...
make[1]: Makefile: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `Makefile'. Stop.
make: *** [all] Error 2
I'm also curious why the switch happens twice... According to the debug
trace, it tries to remake build/config-host.mak using the implicit force
rule:
GNUmakefile:12: update target 'build/config-host.mak' due to: force
Then there should be an explicit empty rule for build/config-host.mak. I
will send a fix for that in v2. Then it would fail like this:
$ make
changing dir to build for /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make ""...
make[1]: Makefile: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `Makefile'. Stop.
make: *** [all] Error 2
Regards,
Roman
> > +
> > ifeq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),)
> > recurse: all
> > endif
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-24 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-22 21:21 [PATCH 0/4] Compatibility make fixes for meson Roman Bolshakov
2020-08-22 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] configure: Use discovered make for in-source build Roman Bolshakov
2020-08-24 14:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-24 14:37 ` Eric Blake
2020-08-24 22:07 ` Roman Bolshakov [this message]
2020-08-25 10:16 ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-08-25 14:06 ` Eric Blake
2020-08-24 14:43 ` Eric Blake
2020-08-22 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] Makefile: Require GNU make 3.82+ Roman Bolshakov
2020-08-24 14:32 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-22 21:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] configure: Prefer gmake on darwin Roman Bolshakov
2020-08-24 14:48 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-24 14:49 ` Eric Blake
2020-08-24 14:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-24 14:56 ` Eric Blake
2020-08-24 15:57 ` Peter Maydell
2020-08-25 9:25 ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-08-22 21:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] configure: Test if $make actually exists Roman Bolshakov
2020-08-24 14:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200824220755.GC41106@SPB-NB-133.local \
--to=r.bolshakov@yadro.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.