From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/numa: use runnable_avg to classify node
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:58:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825135841.GC3033@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825121818.30260-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:18:18PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Use runnable_avg to classify numa node state similarly to what is done for
> normal load balancer. This helps to ensure that numa and normal balancers
> use the same view of the state of the system.
>
> - large arm64system: 2 nodes / 224 CPUs
> hackbench -l (256000/#grp) -g #grp
>
> grp tip/sched/core +patchset improvement
> 1 14,008(+/- 4,99 %) 13,800(+/- 3.88 %) 1,48 %
> 4 4,340(+/- 5.35 %) 4.283(+/- 4.85 %) 1,33 %
> 16 3,357(+/- 0.55 %) 3.359(+/- 0.54 %) -0,06 %
> 32 3,050(+/- 0.94 %) 3.039(+/- 1,06 %) 0,38 %
> 64 2.968(+/- 1,85 %) 3.006(+/- 2.92 %) -1.27 %
> 128 3,290(+/-12.61 %) 3,108(+/- 5.97 %) 5.51 %
> 256 3.235(+/- 3.95 %) 3,188(+/- 2.83 %) 1.45 %
>
Intuitively the patch makes sense but I'm not a fan of using hackbench
for evaluating NUMA balancing. The tasks are too short-lived and it's
not sensitive enough to data placement because of the small footprint
and because hackbench tends to saturate a machine.
As predicting NUMA balancing behaviour in your head can be difficult, I've
queued up a battery of tests on a few different NUMA machines and will see
what falls out. It'll take a few days as some of the tests are long-lived.
Baseline will be 5.9-rc2 as I haven't looked at the topology rework in
tip/sched/core and this patch should not be related to it.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-25 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 12:18 [PATCH] sched/numa: use runnable_avg to classify node Vincent Guittot
2020-08-25 13:58 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2020-08-25 15:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-08-27 15:35 ` Mel Gorman
2020-08-27 15:43 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-08-27 18:22 ` Mel Gorman
2020-08-28 6:47 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200825135841.GC3033@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.