From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH nf-next 1/4] netfilter: conntrack: do not increment two error counters at same time
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:52:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825225245.8072-2-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825225245.8072-1-fw@strlen.de>
The /proc interface for nf_conntrack displays the "error" counter as
"icmp_error".
It makes sense to not increment "invalid" when failing to handle an icmp
packet since those are special.
For example, its possible for conntrack to see partial and/or fragmented
packets inside icmp errors. This should be a separate event and not get
mixed with the "invalid" counter.
Likewise, remove the "error" increment for errors from get_l4proto().
After this, the error counter will only increment for errors coming from
icmp(v6) packet handling.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 5b97d233f89b..3cfbafdff941 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1725,10 +1725,8 @@ nf_conntrack_handle_icmp(struct nf_conn *tmpl,
else
return NF_ACCEPT;
- if (ret <= 0) {
+ if (ret <= 0)
NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(state->net, error);
- NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(state->net, invalid);
- }
return ret;
}
@@ -1813,7 +1811,6 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state)
dataoff = get_l4proto(skb, skb_network_offset(skb), state->pf, &protonum);
if (dataoff <= 0) {
pr_debug("not prepared to track yet or error occurred\n");
- NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(state->net, error);
NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(state->net, invalid);
ret = NF_ACCEPT;
goto out;
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-25 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 22:52 [PATCH nf-next 0/4] netfilter: revisit conntrack statistics Florian Westphal
2020-08-25 22:52 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2020-08-25 22:52 ` [PATCH nf-next 2/4] netfilter: conntrack: remove ignore stats Florian Westphal
2020-08-25 22:52 ` [PATCH nf-next 3/4] netfilter: conntrack: add clash resolution stat counter Florian Westphal
2020-08-25 22:52 ` [PATCH nf-next 4/4] netfilter: conntrack: remove unneeded nf_ct_put Florian Westphal
2020-08-28 17:52 ` [PATCH nf-next 0/4] netfilter: revisit conntrack statistics Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200825225245.8072-2-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.