From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, elver@google.com, jgross@suse.com,
paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
svens@linux.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 21:05:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200827010543.GA1939707@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200821085348.192346882@infradead.org>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:47:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Sven reported that commit a21ee6055c30 ("lockdep: Change
> hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables") caused trouble on
> s390 because their this_cpu_*() primitives disable preemption which
> then lands back tracing.
>
> On the one hand, per-cpu ops should use preempt_*able_notrace() and
> raw_local_irq_*(), on the other hand, we can trivialy use raw_cpu_*()
> ops for this.
>
> Fixes: a21ee6055c30 ("lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables")
> Reported-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
thanks,
- Joel
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> include/linux/irqflags.h | 6 +++---
> include/linux/lockdep.h | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/irqflags.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqflags.h
> @@ -53,13 +53,13 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, hardirq_context);
> extern void trace_hardirqs_off_finish(void);
> extern void trace_hardirqs_on(void);
> extern void trace_hardirqs_off(void);
> -# define lockdep_hardirq_context() (this_cpu_read(hardirq_context))
> +# define lockdep_hardirq_context() (raw_cpu_read(hardirq_context))
> # define lockdep_softirq_context(p) ((p)->softirq_context)
> # define lockdep_hardirqs_enabled() (this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled))
> # define lockdep_softirqs_enabled(p) ((p)->softirqs_enabled)
> # define lockdep_hardirq_enter() \
> do { \
> - if (this_cpu_inc_return(hardirq_context) == 1) \
> + if (__this_cpu_inc_return(hardirq_context) == 1)\
> current->hardirq_threaded = 0; \
> } while (0)
> # define lockdep_hardirq_threaded() \
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ do { \
> } while (0)
> # define lockdep_hardirq_exit() \
> do { \
> - this_cpu_dec(hardirq_context); \
> + __this_cpu_dec(hardirq_context); \
> } while (0)
> # define lockdep_softirq_enter() \
> do { \
> --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> @@ -535,19 +535,27 @@ do { \
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, hardirqs_enabled);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, hardirq_context);
>
> +/*
> + * The below lockdep_assert_*() macros use raw_cpu_read() to access the above
> + * per-cpu variables. This is required because this_cpu_read() will potentially
> + * call into preempt/irq-disable and that obviously isn't right. This is also
> + * correct because when IRQs are enabled, it doesn't matter if we accidentally
> + * read the value from our previous CPU.
> + */
> +
> #define lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled() \
> do { \
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)); \
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() \
> do { \
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)); \
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled)); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define lockdep_assert_in_irq() \
> do { \
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !this_cpu_read(hardirq_context)); \
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !raw_cpu_read(hardirq_context)); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define lockdep_assert_preemption_enabled() \
> @@ -555,7 +563,7 @@ do { \
> WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && \
> debug_locks && \
> (preempt_count() != 0 || \
> - !this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled))); \
> + !raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled))); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled() \
> @@ -563,7 +571,7 @@ do { \
> WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && \
> debug_locks && \
> (preempt_count() == 0 && \
> - this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled))); \
> + raw_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled))); \
> } while (0)
>
> #else
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -3756,7 +3756,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigne
>
> skip_checks:
> /* we'll do an OFF -> ON transition: */
> - this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 1);
> + __this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 1);
> trace->hardirq_enable_ip = ip;
> trace->hardirq_enable_event = ++trace->irq_events;
> debug_atomic_inc(hardirqs_on_events);
> @@ -3795,7 +3795,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_off(unsign
> /*
> * We have done an ON -> OFF transition:
> */
> - this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 0);
> + __this_cpu_write(hardirqs_enabled, 0);
> trace->hardirq_disable_ip = ip;
> trace->hardirq_disable_event = ++trace->irq_events;
> debug_atomic_inc(hardirqs_off_events);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-27 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-21 8:47 [PATCH v2 00/11] TRACE_IRQFLAGS wreckage Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27 1:05 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] cpuidle: Fixup IRQ state Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 17:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-27 1:06 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] sched,idle,rcu: Push rcu_idle deeper into the idle path Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27 1:18 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-27 1:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-27 7:47 ` peterz
2020-08-27 7:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-08-27 22:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-02 7:08 ` peterz
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] cpuidle: Make CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED generic Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] cpuidle: Move trace_cpu_idle() into generic code Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/entry: Remove unused THUNKs Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] locking/lockdep: Cleanup Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] nds32: Implement arch_irqs_disabled() Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] arm64: " Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] lockdep: Only trace IRQ edges Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-26 0:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-02 4:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-02 9:09 ` peterz
2020-09-02 9:12 ` peterz
2020-09-02 13:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-08 14:22 ` peterz
2020-09-08 14:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-08 15:41 ` [PATCH] sparc64: Fix irqtrace warnings on Ultra-S peterz
2020-08-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-09-02 3:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] " Guenter Roeck
2020-09-02 7:24 ` peterz
2020-09-02 13:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-02 8:56 ` peterz
2020-09-02 13:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-03 14:00 ` peterz
2020-09-03 14:13 ` peterz
2020-09-03 15:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-03 15:36 ` peterz
2020-09-03 15:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-03 18:11 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-08-21 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] TRACE_IRQFLAGS wreckage peterz
2020-08-26 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/11] mips: Implement arch_irqs_disabled() peterz
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200827010543.GA1939707@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.