From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D56C433E1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA61D2080C for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:38:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DA61D2080C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ens-lyon.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kBMmo-0003So-KK; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:38:10 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kBMmn-0003Sj-8M for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:38:09 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: a8410d38-fe55-4a1c-8c75-dd173bed564f Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr (unknown [185.233.100.1]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id a8410d38-fe55-4a1c-8c75-dd173bed564f; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0249335; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:38:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oLn007mvFNTD; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:38:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from function (lfbn-bor-1-797-11.w86-234.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.234.239.11]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C09592DC; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:38:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from samy by function with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kBMmh-0003rE-Sc; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:38:03 +0200 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:38:03 +0200 From: Samuel Thibault To: Costin Lupu Cc: Jan Beulich , osstest service owner , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [xen-unstable-smoke test] 152898: regressions - FAIL Message-ID: <20200827183803.32e5flm6dh62c3da@function> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Thibault , Costin Lupu , Jan Beulich , osstest service owner , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: I am not organized User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Costin Lupu, le jeu. 27 août 2020 19:47:08 +0300, a ecrit: > On 8/27/20 7:07 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 27.08.2020 17:49, osstest service owner wrote: > >> flight 152898 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] > >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152898/ > >> > >> Regressions :-( > >> > >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > >> including tests which could not be run: > >> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 152892 > > > > This looks to be an issue in the mini-os tree, and I'm having > > trouble understanding how it can cause the main tree to first > > discover it. Is there no push gate for that tree? > > > > In any event, commit 1b8ed31f4ce4 ("mini-os: netfront: Read netmask > > and gateway from Xenstore") looks to have missed callers to > > init_netfront(), both in the mini-os tree itself and in stubdom/grub/ > > of the main tree. > > Hi Jan, > > Sorry for missing that. I've just sent a patch on the mini-os mailing > list. Please let me know if it needs anything else. We need a patch for stubdom/grub/mini-os.c Samuel