Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] i2c: Allow an ACPI driver to manage the device's power state during probe

[Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3346 bytes --]

Hi Sakari,

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:54:27PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Enable drivers to tell ACPI that there's no need to power on a device for
> probe. Drivers should still perform this by themselves if there's a need
> to. In some cases powering on the device during probe is undesirable, and
> this change enables a driver to choose what fits best for it.
> 
> Add a field called "flags" into struct i2c_driver for driver flags, and a
> flag I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE to tell a driver supports probe in
> low power state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  include/linux/i2c.h         | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 34a9609f256da..f2683790eb0d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -436,6 +436,15 @@ static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
>  	return irq > 0 ? irq : -ENXIO;
>  }
>  
> +static bool allow_low_power_probe(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct i2c_driver *driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
> +
> +	return driver->flags & I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE &&
> +		is_acpi_node(dev_fwnode(dev)) &&
> +		device_property_present(dev, "allow-low-power-probe");

So, I wondered about potential DT usage and I read the discussion about
that in v5 which concluded that for the DT case, the drivers can make
use of the binding individually. I can agree to that, but then the name
of the binding is probably problematic. 'allow-*' sounds like
configuration but DT is for describing HW. So, I think something in the
range of 'keep-low-power' or so might be better suited. Grepping shows
there already is a generic binding "low-power-enable". Not sure, if it
really fits, because here it is more about 'keeping' rather than
enabling. Or?

> +/**
> + * enum i2c_driver_flags - Flags for an I2C device driver
> + *
> + * @I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE: Let the ACPI driver manage the device's
> + *				      power state during probe and remove
> + */
> +enum i2c_driver_flags {
> +	I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE = BIT(0),
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * struct i2c_driver - represent an I2C device driver
>   * @class: What kind of i2c device we instantiate (for detect)
> @@ -231,6 +242,7 @@ enum i2c_alert_protocol {
>   * @detect: Callback for device detection
>   * @address_list: The I2C addresses to probe (for detect)
>   * @clients: List of detected clients we created (for i2c-core use only)
> + * @flags: A bitmask of flags defined in &enum i2c_driver_flags
>   *
>   * The driver.owner field should be set to the module owner of this driver.
>   * The driver.name field should be set to the name of this driver.
> @@ -289,6 +301,8 @@ struct i2c_driver {
>  	int (*detect)(struct i2c_client *client, struct i2c_board_info *info);
>  	const unsigned short *address_list;
>  	struct list_head clients;
> +
> +	unsigned int flags;

Here I wonder if all this is really I2C specific? I could imagine this
being useful for other busses as well, so maybe 'struct device_driver'
is a better place?

Thanks for this work!

All the best,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]