From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800F9C433E6 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514AB2067C for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729729AbgIAP1Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:27:24 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:43580 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730195AbgIAP1V (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:27:21 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579D91045; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:27:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5733C3F71F; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:27:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:27:17 +0100 From: Dave Martin To: Will Deacon Cc: Shuah Khan , Catalin Marinas , Mark Brown , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: arm64: Add floating point selftests Message-ID: <20200901152716.GZ6642@arm.com> References: <20200819114837.51466-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200901132159.GA3579@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200901132159.GA3579@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:21:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 03:45:46PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 8/19/20 5:48 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > This series imports a series of tests for FPSIMD and SVE originally > > > written by Dave Martin to the tree. Since these extensions have some > > > overlap in terms of register usage and must sometimes be tested together > > > they're dropped into a single directory. I've adapted some of the tests > > > to run within the kselftest framework but there are also some stress > > > tests here that are intended to be run as soak tests so aren't suitable > > > for running by default and are mostly just integrated with the build > > > system. There doesn't seem to be a more suitable home for those stress > > > tests and they are very useful for work on these areas of the code so it > > > seems useful to have them somewhere in tree. > > > > > > v2: Rebased onto v5.9-rc1 > > > > > > Mark Brown (6): > > > selftests: arm64: Test case for enumeration of SVE vector lengths > > > selftests: arm64: Add test for the SVE ptrace interface > > > selftests: arm64: Add stress tests for FPSMID and SVE context > > > switching > > > selftests: arm64: Add utility to set SVE vector lengths > > > selftests: arm64: Add wrapper scripts for stress tests > > > selftests: arm64: Add build and documentation for FP tests > > > > Patches look good to me from selftests perspective. My acked by > > for these patches to go through arm64. > > > > Acked-by: Shuah Khan > > Thanks, Shuah. > > > If you would like me to take these through kselftest tree, give > > me your Acks. I can queue these up for 5.10-rc1 > > Given there are a few arm64 kselftests series pending at the moment, I'll > queue them in the arm64 tree, but on their own branch in case you end up > needing to pull it in as well. I'll drop you a note once I've done that > (I'm just starting to queue stuff this week). > > Will FWIW, Acked-by: Dave Martin I haven't gone through the integration in detail, but nothing leaps out as disastrously wrong. I'm not sure how useful these tests are to people in general, but they've been valuable for maintaining the FP context switch code on arm64. I think it makes sense to keep them alongside the kernel so that they don't get get lost. Cheers ---Dave From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEA2C433E6 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9811206C0 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="jzboLHlh" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E9811206C0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=1aNscRbxVcAJYIM/B2dFjkN8fpMX9iONOkHnH2IXQ9w=; b=jzboLHlhfBO7J3EjHtmqolS0h Nrr6tymDNFObjFdjwcZ/Kh/xxoWinLNpKwagN7slPmAgfy4BOqEUoJe22LqghC2n5QM8IWJHz0bmr jKdrqIj9mZWq6jIQzis1JGRHpM1x8vuZ3VylrNfGC5WiS2XLgp39ogTUDHhA5BU8jqk0+UMM8TDaT 2KI0Tfsp8pIXPlPWk6GANXQlWghuSMRNdzU7a7a2O9Cb1rKzKKOb6CEnPil/hkRmLOJ4w3uK9Mo8V GCRy0DEY1Q9CiP7Tjpy/vjhcvmbccGwGNSv634WVt5qrOsR+Y+JlA90sfHYLwhYh+Z4NF8oFYa8lv 9Wwbs6/cA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kD8CA-0001Aa-P0; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 15:27:38 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kD8Bu-00016r-FB for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 15:27:24 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579D91045; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:27:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5733C3F71F; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:27:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:27:17 +0100 From: Dave Martin To: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: arm64: Add floating point selftests Message-ID: <20200901152716.GZ6642@arm.com> References: <20200819114837.51466-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200901132159.GA3579@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200901132159.GA3579@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200901_112722_589153_BE6DA3D2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 29.24 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Catalin Marinas , Mark Brown , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:21:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 03:45:46PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 8/19/20 5:48 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > This series imports a series of tests for FPSIMD and SVE originally > > > written by Dave Martin to the tree. Since these extensions have some > > > overlap in terms of register usage and must sometimes be tested together > > > they're dropped into a single directory. I've adapted some of the tests > > > to run within the kselftest framework but there are also some stress > > > tests here that are intended to be run as soak tests so aren't suitable > > > for running by default and are mostly just integrated with the build > > > system. There doesn't seem to be a more suitable home for those stress > > > tests and they are very useful for work on these areas of the code so it > > > seems useful to have them somewhere in tree. > > > > > > v2: Rebased onto v5.9-rc1 > > > > > > Mark Brown (6): > > > selftests: arm64: Test case for enumeration of SVE vector lengths > > > selftests: arm64: Add test for the SVE ptrace interface > > > selftests: arm64: Add stress tests for FPSMID and SVE context > > > switching > > > selftests: arm64: Add utility to set SVE vector lengths > > > selftests: arm64: Add wrapper scripts for stress tests > > > selftests: arm64: Add build and documentation for FP tests > > > > Patches look good to me from selftests perspective. My acked by > > for these patches to go through arm64. > > > > Acked-by: Shuah Khan > > Thanks, Shuah. > > > If you would like me to take these through kselftest tree, give > > me your Acks. I can queue these up for 5.10-rc1 > > Given there are a few arm64 kselftests series pending at the moment, I'll > queue them in the arm64 tree, but on their own branch in case you end up > needing to pull it in as well. I'll drop you a note once I've done that > (I'm just starting to queue stuff this week). > > Will FWIW, Acked-by: Dave Martin I haven't gone through the integration in detail, but nothing leaps out as disastrously wrong. I'm not sure how useful these tests are to people in general, but they've been valuable for maintaining the FP context switch code on arm64. I think it makes sense to keep them alongside the kernel so that they don't get get lost. Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel