From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] exit: support non-blocking pidfds
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:11:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901161154.GA4386@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200831134551.1599689-3-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
On 08/31, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -934,6 +934,7 @@ struct wait_opts {
>
> wait_queue_entry_t child_wait;
> int notask_error;
> + int eagain_error;
> };
>
> static int eligible_pid(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -1461,6 +1462,8 @@ static long do_wait(struct wait_opts *wo)
>
> notask:
> retval = wo->notask_error;
> + if (!retval)
> + retval = wo->eagain_error;
> if (!retval && !(wo->wo_flags & WNOHANG)) {
> retval = -ERESTARTSYS;
I must have missed something but I don't understand why do we need
the new ->eagain_error and the change in do_wait().
> @@ -1544,6 +1551,11 @@ static long kernel_waitid(int which, pid_t upid, struct waitid_info *infop,
> wo.wo_flags = options;
> wo.wo_info = infop;
> wo.wo_rusage = ru;
> + wo.eagain_error = 0;
> + if (f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> + wo.wo_flags |= WNOHANG;
> + wo.eagain_error = -EAGAIN;
> + }
> ret = do_wait(&wo);
Can't kernel_waitid() simply do
if (f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
wo.wo_flags |= WNOHANG;
ret = do_wait();
if (!ret & (f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
ret = -EAGAIN;
?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-01 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-31 13:45 [PATCH 0/4] Support non-blocking pidfds Christian Brauner
2020-08-31 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] pidfd: support PIDFD_NONBLOCK in pidfd_open() Christian Brauner
2020-09-01 16:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-01 16:33 ` Christian Brauner
2020-09-01 16:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-08-31 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] exit: support non-blocking pidfds Christian Brauner
2020-09-01 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2020-09-01 16:18 ` Christian Brauner
2020-08-31 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] tests: port pidfd_wait to kselftest harness Christian Brauner
2020-08-31 13:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] tests: add waitid() tests for non-blocking pidfds Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200901161154.GA4386@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.