From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=66.111.4.27; helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=bO8tosyr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=hyjc1uvD; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BgstB3sX6zDqQL for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 02:27:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848585C005A; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:27:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:27:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm2; bh=GMRXj3DZPtrXV6ueRbXZrG79tKN EZ/y97cQcuZbUGv4=; b=bO8tosyracLTvVlid3EUCXImOBxEQKkWTag2Xal3vdn 3binzONMgN67QleMX/L7tSdp9wVLWCcXUi9u6oUjEzKvSK5IA64+UbbnNsWr7AtK j4GYjgHFbPVB8dbxMKca/34FnFEl+sk5LyfOrZQfZO2ru7wJ2fWv9dfu+RXHpIc1 SPKBnibL3YKoOORD2CwwFjA30gqndXIjZg6xzymQiVbnAvVFH3mrmyKHCMWb/rmV H5HWQNZKOWP5X9yQIiPBIFCuXlRRvwHNXcctGQpAYVJsPM+dfDcvvAmoyGNHsKwl 70LcC7zggrvhG7i/gZ1Fw2Qlb0fJokP5rXFRTiWAGqA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=GMRXj3 DZPtrXV6ueRbXZrG79tKNEZ/y97cQcuZbUGv4=; b=hyjc1uvDpKDeM7T6ZuZux/ /OI45FUm14H4DIZKn9HMT+3QAvD56Sguklp0YeslFUU43TVnSsFhuEcvVBG3+rew HmAFkiuAsfao85vCAAMBoUOVXnQ9TeRMy2Hpe7efaWxeQOw17n2dnABwFR3qJXYX jMybJ/zHYyBszs02d/W4QJtbapLLp9k7lMHaLJD0+f72IgHJqai945VhLmx0sWGy tdrVR0nRtAIit2WM3XvEwXnwRjp/qnboazD3c1EKZPaeNsbR0wRvKCKm+gDCmhW8 NaMJdZZRYxOp0Yax6UvJkAHXqMYcYyVVpfWX442UGhqB7ijYer6cTGgtRCwMyfiA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudefjedguddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enfghrlhcuvffnffculdefhedmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredt tddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehprghtrhhitghkse hsthiftgigrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelhfejfeekteevffegteffudef heelfeehvdfggfdvgffhjefhfeffkeeiieevjeenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecukfhppedutdejrdelvddrheejrdefheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehprghtrhhitghksehsthiftgigrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (mobile-107-92-57-35.mycingular.net [107.92.57.35]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 71D1F30600A3; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:27:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:27:25 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: TOM JOSEPH Cc: "Mauery, Vernon" , benjaminfair@google.com, OpenBMC Maillist , anoo@us.ibm.com, Brad Bishop Subject: Re: IPMI implementation of Get Device ID command Message-ID: <20200901162725.GU3532@heinlein> References: <20200814231020.GA16853@mauery.jf.intel.com> <4cde2763-88b0-447b-1aba-5bb884fae251@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200824212702.GD3532@heinlein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kSOhxpxUsM1s2qz/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 16:27:31 -0000 --kSOhxpxUsM1s2qz/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 06:23:36PM +0530, TOM JOSEPH wrote: > For translating IBM firmware revision to IPMI firmware version, the plan= =20 > is to continue using VERSION_ID in os-release. This translation is=20 > obsolete=20 > (https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/blob/master/meta-ibm/recipes-phosphor= /ipmi/phosphor-ipmi-config.bbappend),=20 > but I will update this to handle the major and minor firmware revision.= =20 > I will work on pushing a patch for that. Sounds good, thanks. I just wanted to make sure there was an example to point people to that did what was being suggested. Looks like this =2Ebbappend is it. --=20 Patrick Williams --kSOhxpxUsM1s2qz/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIyBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAl9Odm0ACgkQqwNHzC0A wRnzCQ/3aJp8Zo58pLAf+xc9kpFUxCUnbk1Pfumpz1V/p4gN8V18tuSINcBwo2Iz /DHZbHKHo9kvknyzi4pqkkkOEGzW618Kjx/are5X+MankSW0Qb+nDh93R0wEl2S6 IxfZ4958VcEqg0QWaoQgEj4vam3QObIWeS8x9+rKeYe+2HfLgRFE1rd51lnFgalk BA1Pwm+pxyqeaR51TczzZMdFeyg2DtX5XdNhbrFBlbmaj0HFvB6/MBGrowUUUyrW c81D1kOyV5zwy2lDmvUCwPPaJVYPRsVOyPJVkNQLEKt6ObPqsCuahh2Vr9U424Xa e3kp4rdijb12E/9klOJLIOGE6i4pL6jKO1cbvuCT4CzcgusGPG1oDM4Q3D66t8eX nsAm/RF7JlFkGKUCgS3FqiO0DoykC/AqB85TujBMK5i0Ea41d4cdSsFSB9junHN/ mZsF3ucMoSuf12j8CM9DS9iflMjCmVZjJQeVr3AnP+0YxBgCxVDCVtpHSjUkdw+g ntkYht5spxpnlSC0w4TUYuGo2fajbwwQep3tkMM0u7+Zx102PZnVr0YVJ0FClFhn 7cJzLLA1+l5QX3igDIpiqYRWuaJcLZ34G+3oAIgMi96FT69+Uj3dfvbTXO5aWcXc gY+eObogUU4nKMPYk6ONdtfx29ILNLrK6CBhUmBAQ2yGR56icQ== =2Lok -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kSOhxpxUsM1s2qz/--