From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/x86: add kcpuid tool to show raw CPU features
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:55:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902165501.GC21537@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200902164538.GN1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:45:38PM +0200, peterz@infradead.org wrote:
> We really should clear the CPUID bits when the kernel explicitly
> disables things.
Actually, you want to *disable* the functionality behind it by clearing
a bit in CR4 - and yes, not all features have CR4 bits - so that
luserspace doesn't "probe" the existence of certain instructions.
Example: you can still try to run RDRAND and succeed even if the
corresponding CPUID bit is clear.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-27 7:49 [RFC PATCH] tools/x86: add kcpuid tool to show raw CPU features Feng Tang
2020-09-02 15:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-02 16:25 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-02 16:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-02 17:18 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-02 18:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-03 7:17 ` Feng Tang
2020-09-02 16:45 ` peterz
2020-09-02 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-02 16:59 ` peterz
2020-09-02 16:55 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-09-02 17:01 ` peterz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-21 2:00 Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200902165501.GC21537@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.