From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] perf bench: fix return value check in do_run_multi_threaded()
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:54:51 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200903185451.GF3495158@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200903185301.GE3495158@kernel.org>
Em Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:53:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 10:05:26PM +0800, YueHaibing escreveu:
> > In case of error, the function perf_session__new() returns ERR_PTR()
> > and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check
> > should be replaced with IS_ERR()
> >
> > Fixes: 13edc237200c ("perf bench: Add a multi-threaded synthesize benchmark")
> > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>
> Thanks, applied, kudos for adding the Fixes: tag, appreciated!
But...
> > ---
> > tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c b/tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c
> > index 8d624aea1c5e..e39daa609db2 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/bench/synthesize.c
> > @@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ static int do_run_multi_threaded(struct target *target,
> > init_stats(&event_stats);
> > for (i = 0; i < multi_iterations; i++) {
> > session = perf_session__new(NULL, false, NULL);
> > - if (!session)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + if (IS_ERR(session)) {
> > + return PTR_ERR(session);
This doesn't compile, so I take back that kudo ;-\
I'm fixing this by removing that needless '{'.
Please be more careful,
- Arnaldo
> >
> > atomic_set(&event_count, 0);
> > gettimeofday(&start, NULL);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-03 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 14:05 [PATCH -next] perf bench: fix return value check in do_run_multi_threaded() YueHaibing
2020-09-02 16:09 ` Ian Rogers
2020-09-03 18:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-03 18:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2020-09-03 18:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-04 13:25 ` Yuehaibing
2020-09-04 16:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200903185451.GF3495158@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.