From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
Changhui Zhong <czhong@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 💥 PANICKED: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc3-020ad03.cki (block)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:02:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200904010233.GA817918@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cki.538AE6A321.BMB0X5ZYG5@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:07:57PM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
>
> Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
> Commit: 020ad0333b03 - Merge branch 'for-5.10/block' into for-next
>
> The results of these automated tests are provided below.
>
> Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> Merge: OK
> Compile: OK
> Tests: PANICKED
>
> All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
>
> https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse/2020/09/02/613166
>
> One or more kernel tests failed:
>
> ppc64le:
> 💥 storage: software RAID testing
>
> aarch64:
> 💥 storage: software RAID testing
>
> x86_64:
> 💥 storage: software RAID testing
>
> We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
> detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.
>
> Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
> ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
>
> ,-. ,-.
> ( C ) ( K ) Continuous
> `-',-.`-' Kernel
> ( I ) Integration
> `-'
> ______________________________________________________________________________
>
> Compile testing
> ---------------
>
> We compiled the kernel for 4 architectures:
>
> aarch64:
> make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
>
> ppc64le:
> make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
>
> s390x:
> make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
>
> x86_64:
> make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg
>
>
>
> Hardware testing
> ----------------
> We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
>
> aarch64:
> Host 1:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ ACPI table test
> ✅ LTP
> ✅ Loopdev Sanity
> ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
> ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
> ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
> ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
> 🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
> 🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
>
> Host 2:
>
> ⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked
> with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture.
> This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested.
>
> ⚡⚡⚡ Boot test
> ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - ext4
> ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - xfs
> ⚡⚡⚡ storage: software RAID testing
> ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - btrfs
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
>
> Host 3:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ xfstests - ext4
> ✅ xfstests - xfs
> 💥 storage: software RAID testing
> ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - btrfs
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
>
> ppc64le:
> Host 1:
> ✅ Boot test
> 🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
>
> Host 2:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ xfstests - ext4
> ✅ xfstests - xfs
> 💥 storage: software RAID testing
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - btrfs
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
>
> Host 3:
>
> ⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked
> with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture.
> This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested.
>
> ✅ Boot test
> ⚡⚡⚡ LTP
> ⚡⚡⚡ Loopdev Sanity
> ⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: memfd_create
> ⚡⚡⚡ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
> ⚡⚡⚡ Ethernet drivers sanity
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ CIFS Connectathon
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
>
> s390x:
> Host 1:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ stress: stress-ng
> 🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
>
> Host 2:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ LTP
> ✅ Loopdev Sanity
> ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
> ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
> ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
> 🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
> 🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
>
> x86_64:
> Host 1:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ Storage SAN device stress - qedf driver
>
> Host 2:
> ⏱ Boot test
> ⏱ Storage SAN device stress - mpt3sas_gen1
>
> Host 3:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ xfstests - ext4
> ✅ xfstests - xfs
> 💥 storage: software RAID testing
> ⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - btrfs
> 🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
>
> Host 4:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ Storage SAN device stress - lpfc driver
>
> Host 5:
> ✅ Boot test
> 🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
>
> Host 6:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ ACPI table test
> ✅ LTP
> ✅ Loopdev Sanity
> ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
> ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
> ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
> ✅ kernel-rt: rt_migrate_test
> ✅ kernel-rt: rteval
> ✅ kernel-rt: sched_deadline
> ✅ kernel-rt: smidetect
> ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
> 🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
> 🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
>
> Host 7:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ kdump - sysrq-c - megaraid_sas
>
> Host 8:
> ✅ Boot test
> ✅ Storage SAN device stress - qla2xxx driver
>
> Host 9:
> ⏱ Boot test
> ⏱ kdump - sysrq-c - mpt3sas_gen1
>
> Test sources: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests
Hello,
Can you share us the exact commands for setting up xfstests over
'software RAID testing' from the above tree?
BTW I can't reproduce it by running xfstest generic/551 on my simple raid10
settings, include raid stop/remove steps.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-04 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-03 17:07 💥 PANICKED: Test report for kernel 5.9.0-rc3-020ad03.cki (block) CKI Project
2020-09-03 17:10 ` Rachel Sibley
2020-09-03 17:46 ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-03 18:59 ` Rachel Sibley
2020-09-03 19:58 ` Veronika Kabatova
2020-09-03 20:53 ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-04 3:22 ` Ming Lei
2020-09-04 3:37 ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-04 4:24 ` Ming Lei
2020-09-04 15:06 ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-04 1:02 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-09-04 11:06 ` Veronika Kabatova
2020-09-06 3:19 ` 💥 PANICKED: Test report for?kernel " Ming Lei
2020-09-07 18:49 ` 💥 PANICKED: Test report for kernel " Veronika Kabatova
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200904010233.GA817918@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
--cc=czhong@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.