From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: sx9310: Prefer async probe
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 16:22:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200906162234.4a829a0a@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHcu+VarBz3m_zKfDB0osQsjZ0dMpvUk+q2Qt-yC5DbPjr0bRA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:01:29 -0600
Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 9:43 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-09-01 08:19:43)
> > > On one board I found that:
> > > probe of 5-0028 returned 1 after 259547 usecs
> > >
> > > While some of this time is attributable to the pile of i2c transfers
> > > that we do at probe time, the lion's share (over 200 ms) is sitting
> > > waiting in the polling loop in sx9310_init_compensation() waiting for
> > > the hardware to indicate that it's done.
> > >
> > > There's no reason to block probe of all other devices on our probe.
> > > Turn on async probe.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Campello <campello@chromium.org>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to poke at it.
thanks,
Jonathan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-06 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-01 15:19 [PATCH v2] iio: sx9310: Prefer async probe Douglas Anderson
2020-09-01 15:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-09-01 17:01 ` Daniel Campello
2020-09-06 15:22 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200906162234.4a829a0a@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=campello@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.