Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:46:23 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:54:40 +0200
> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 16.07.20 14:02, Cornelia Huck wrote:  
> > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400
> > > Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >     
> > >> On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:    
> > >>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400
> > >>> Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >>>       
> > >>>> Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now,
> > >>>> and it doesn't look like any further changes are requested (hopefully I
> > >>>> didn't miss something).      
> > >>>
> > >>> The only thing I had was (I think) the logging of the length you just
> > >>> replied to. We can still tweak things like that later, of course.
> > >>>
> > >>> As these patches depend on a headers sync, I could not yet queue them.
> > >>> I can keep a preliminary version on a branch. I assume that the header
> > >>> changes will go in during the next kernel merge window? (If I missed
> > >>> something, apologies for that.)
> > >>>       
> > >>
> > >> Gotcha. Thanks for the update :)
> > >>
> > >> There was an email on the KVM list a couple of days that made one change
> > >> to the Linux header. Just changed the integer used for the DIAG cap,
> > >> which should be reflected in QEMU as well.
> > >>
> > >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg220548.html
> > >>
> > >> Should I respin this patch series to include the new ack's and account
> > >> for the header sync?    
> > > 
> > > No need for that, my tooling picks up acks and the headers update needs
> > > to be replaced with a sync against a proper Linux version anyway.
> > > 
> > > I've queued the patches on a local branch, and the only patch that did
> > > not apply cleanly was the headers patch, which will get replaced later
> > > anyway :) Just ping me when the kernel patches hit upstream, then I'll
> > > do a header sync against the next -rc and queue the patches on
> > > s390-next.    
> > 
> > What is the status of this patchset? The kernel part has been merged in 5.9-rc1.
> >   
> 
> Thanks for letting me know, I'll go and process this now. (Had some
> busy weeks + PTO.)

There were some minor conflicts, please double check that everything
looks sane.

Thanks, applied.