From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DBEC433E2 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF01216C4 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726414AbgINOeu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:34:50 -0400 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2818 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726745AbgINOc1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:32:27 -0400 Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C7D0D341D0945326592E; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:32:25 +0100 (IST) Received: from localhost (10.52.126.156) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:32:24 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:30:48 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Atish Patra CC: , Albert Ou , Andrew Morton , Anshuman Khandual , Anup Patel , "Arnd Bergmann" , Catalin Marinas , "David Hildenbrand" , Greentime Hu , Bjorn Helgaas , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jia He , , , "Mike Rapoport" , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Palmer Dabbelt , "Paul Walmsley" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Steven Price , Will Deacon , Zong Li Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic Message-ID: <20200914153048.000038ed@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20200912013441.9730-3-atish.patra@wdc.com> References: <20200912013441.9730-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20200912013441.9730-3-atish.patra@wdc.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.52.126.156] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml717-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.68) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700 Atish Patra wrote: > As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function > name to indicate that generic implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections at than anything important. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 ------------- > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > include/asm-generic/numa.h | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) > > node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); > } > - > -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void) > -{ > - int ret; > - > - ret = acpi_numa_init(); > - if (ret) { > - pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n"); > - return ret; > - } > - > - return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0; > -} > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void) > max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max; > min_low_pfn = min; > > - arm64_numa_init(); > + arch_numa_init(); > > /* > - * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to > + * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to > * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve() > * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes. > */ > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c > index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ > #include > #include > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > #include > +#endif Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here and has protections against building for non ACPI cases. > #include > > struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly; > @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void) > return 0; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = acpi_numa_init(); I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init() and srat_disabled() At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though. > + if (ret) { > + pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + > + return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0; > +} > +#else > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void) > +{ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > +#endif > + > /** > - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA > + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA > * > * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The > * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory. > */ > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void) > +void __init arch_numa_init(void) > { > if (!numa_off) { > - if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init)) > + if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init)) > return; > if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init)) > return; > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h > index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644 > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node) > } > #endif > > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void); > +void __init arch_numa_init(void); > int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end); > void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance); > void __init numa_free_distance(void); > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu); > static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { } > static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { } > static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { } > -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { } > +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { } > static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { } > > #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBD4C433E2 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E388A206C9 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="z4hmN4ED" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E388A206C9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=Huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=fZymbjaf8rVNrRFizIGY+vWtvlL651hxQf6v7Qsa3Lg=; b=z4hmN4EDwI6w5dsLaYAESQSxz Ys9DWfd42Phs/4fvOYwb/r6pn/OmplbGHSN30aWm3O/OovUKXiMr6em9AZ/9rNjr0uEiK88Vjcp0s cOu/3u1PYb3C3acRM+7HT7dBgI/VPZylidcFWYJddbsrbNW7r455rnTl96bikbLIZZqG5QnLgL67+ QXzO1RvcYD+HFX17+TOaqSMBlBk17m4M6B5+fKI6habCwDE0mBIljr+RBqTSeXxiFmxDJ/9iCDAy+ /c4IRk7RHyQXHz3dFfzf9v6e2wiYNtWAQ9V1T90tc1czUzj5OzEuAu4fl1YxmKkGrNI5NMzuxVk5j Lny+0okkQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kHpWx-00026C-0z; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:32:31 +0000 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210] helo=huawei.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kHpWu-00025b-JL for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:32:29 +0000 Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C7D0D341D0945326592E; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:32:25 +0100 (IST) Received: from localhost (10.52.126.156) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:32:24 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:30:48 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Atish Patra Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic Message-ID: <20200914153048.000038ed@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20200912013441.9730-3-atish.patra@wdc.com> References: <20200912013441.9730-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20200912013441.9730-3-atish.patra@wdc.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.52.126.156] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml717-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.68) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200914_103228_785717_F78B4304 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: David Hildenbrand , Catalin Marinas , Zong Li , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Jia He , Anup Patel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Steven Price , Bjorn Helgaas , Greentime Hu , Albert Ou , Arnd Bergmann , Anshuman Khandual , Paul Walmsley , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Mike Rapoport , Andrew Morton , Nicolas Saenz Julienne Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700 Atish Patra wrote: > As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function > name to indicate that generic implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections at than anything important. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 ------------- > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > include/asm-generic/numa.h | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c > @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) > > node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); > } > - > -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void) > -{ > - int ret; > - > - ret = acpi_numa_init(); > - if (ret) { > - pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n"); > - return ret; > - } > - > - return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0; > -} > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void) > max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max; > min_low_pfn = min; > > - arm64_numa_init(); > + arch_numa_init(); > > /* > - * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to > + * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to > * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve() > * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes. > */ > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c > index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ > #include > #include > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > #include > +#endif Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here and has protections against building for non ACPI cases. > #include > > struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly; > @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void) > return 0; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = acpi_numa_init(); I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init() and srat_disabled() At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though. > + if (ret) { > + pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + > + return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0; > +} > +#else > +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void) > +{ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > +#endif > + > /** > - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA > + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA > * > * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The > * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory. > */ > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void) > +void __init arch_numa_init(void) > { > if (!numa_off) { > - if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init)) > + if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init)) > return; > if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init)) > return; > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h > index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644 > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node) > } > #endif > > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void); > +void __init arch_numa_init(void); > int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end); > void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance); > void __init numa_free_distance(void); > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu); > static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { } > static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { } > static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { } > -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { } > +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { } > static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { } > > #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv