From: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] net: extract napi poll functionality to __napi_poll()
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:24:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914172453.1833883-4-weiwan@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914172453.1833883-1-weiwan@google.com>
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
This commit introduces a new function __napi_poll() which does the main
logic of the existing napi_poll() function, and will be called by other
functions in later commits.
This idea and implementation is done by Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> and
is proposed as part of the patch to move napi work to work_queue
context.
This commit by itself is a code restructure.
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 0fe4c531b682..bc2a7681b239 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6719,15 +6719,10 @@ void __netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netif_napi_del);
-static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+static int __napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, bool *repoll)
{
- void *have;
int work, weight;
- list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
-
- have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
-
weight = n->weight;
/* This NAPI_STATE_SCHED test is for avoiding a race
@@ -6747,7 +6742,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
n->poll, work, weight);
if (likely(work < weight))
- goto out_unlock;
+ return work;
/* Drivers must not modify the NAPI state if they
* consume the entire weight. In such cases this code
@@ -6756,7 +6751,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
*/
if (unlikely(napi_disable_pending(n))) {
napi_complete(n);
- goto out_unlock;
+ return work;
}
if (n->gro_bitmask) {
@@ -6768,6 +6763,26 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
gro_normal_list(n);
+ *repoll = true;
+
+ return work;
+}
+
+static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+{
+ bool do_repoll = false;
+ void *have;
+ int work;
+
+ list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
+
+ have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
+
+ work = __napi_poll(n, &do_repoll);
+
+ if (!do_repoll)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
/* Some drivers may have called napi_schedule
* prior to exhausting their budget.
*/
--
2.28.0.618.gf4bc123cb7-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 17:24 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] implement kthread based napi poll Wei Wang
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net: implement threaded-able napi poll loop support Wei Wang
2020-09-25 19:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2020-09-25 23:50 ` Wei Wang
2020-09-26 14:22 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2020-09-28 8:45 ` Paolo Abeni
2020-09-28 18:13 ` Wei Wang
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] net: add sysfs attribute to control napi threaded mode Wei Wang
2020-09-15 2:50 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-15 3:47 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-14 17:24 ` Wei Wang [this message]
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/6] net: modify kthread handler to use __napi_poll() Wei Wang
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/6] net: process RPS/RFS work in kthread context Wei Wang
2020-09-18 22:44 ` Wei Wang
2020-09-21 8:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-14 17:24 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/6] net: improve napi threaded config Wei Wang
2020-09-25 13:48 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] implement kthread based napi poll Magnus Karlsson
2020-09-25 17:15 ` Wei Wang
2020-09-25 17:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-25 18:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-09-25 18:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-25 19:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-09-25 19:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-28 14:07 ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-09-28 17:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-09-28 18:15 ` Wei Wang
2020-09-29 19:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-29 20:16 ` Wei Wang
2020-09-29 21:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-30 8:23 ` David Laight
2020-09-30 8:58 ` Paolo Abeni
2020-09-30 15:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200914172453.1833883-4-weiwan@google.com \
--to=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.