From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] clock_gettime04: relax the time diff in VM
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:10:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915081032.GA8111@yuki.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915031402.26519-1-liwang@redhat.com>
Hi!
> To balance that the test inside a VM can NOT get enough CPU time, which
> result in sporadically fails with the time comparing.
>
> clock_gettime04.c:155: PASS: CLOCK_REALTIME: Difference between successive readings is reasonable
> clock_gettime04.c:155: PASS: CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE: Difference between successive readings is reasonable
> clock_gettime04.c:148: FAIL: CLOCK_MONOTONIC: Difference between successive readings greater than 5 ms (2): 22
> clock_gettime04.c:155: PASS: CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE: Difference between successive readings is reasonable
> clock_gettime04.c:148: FAIL: CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW: Difference between successive readings greater than 5 ms (1): 22
> clock_gettime04.c:148: FAIL: CLOCK_BOOTTIME: Difference between successive readings greater than 5 ms (1): 29
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The idea is good, but I think that the implementation could be better.
Why can't we just call the tst_is_virt() in test setup and if we detect
that we are running on virtual machine print a TINFO message that
maximal expected difference has been multiplied by 10?
> ---
> .../kernel/syscalls/clock_gettime/clock_gettime04.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/clock_gettime/clock_gettime04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/clock_gettime/clock_gettime04.c
> index 2f484c43f..5c4a5d751 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/clock_gettime/clock_gettime04.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/clock_gettime/clock_gettime04.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static void run(unsigned int i)
> struct test_variants *tv;
> int count = 10000, ret;
> unsigned int j;
> + int virt_env = tst_is_virt(VIRT_ANY);
>
> do {
> for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(variants); j++) {
> @@ -143,11 +144,17 @@ static void run(unsigned int i)
>
> diff /= 1000000;
>
> - if (diff >= 5) {
> + if (!virt_env && diff >= 5) {
> tst_res(TFAIL, "%s: Difference between successive readings greater than 5 ms (%d): %lld",
> tst_clock_name(clks[i]), j, diff);
> return;
> }
> +
> + if (virt_env && diff >= 50) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "%s: Difference between successive readings(in VM) greater than 50 ms (%d): %lld",
> + tst_clock_name(clks[i]), j, diff);
> + return;
> + }
> }
> } while (--count);
>
> --
> 2.21.3
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 3:14 [LTP] [PATCH] clock_gettime04: relax the time diff in VM Li Wang
2020-09-15 8:10 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2020-09-15 8:20 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200915081032.GA8111@yuki.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.