From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] s390/dis: get rid of set_fs() usage
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 18:55:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915165517.GC11180@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915155217.GA22056@lst.de>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:52:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:43:38PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > + if (user_mode(regs)) {
> > + if (__copy_from_user(code + start - 2, (char __user *)addr, 2))
> > + break;
> > + } else {
> > + if (copy_from_kernel_nofault(code + start - 2, (char *)addr, 2))
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> > for (end = 32; end < 64; end += 2) {
> > addr = regs->psw.addr + end - 32;
> > + if (user_mode(regs)) {
> > + if (__copy_from_user(code + end, (char __user *)addr, 2))
> > + break;
> > + } else {
> > + if (copy_from_kernel_nofault(code + end, (char *)addr, 2))
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> Maybe add a little copy_from_regs helper? That would also get rid
> of the awfully long lines here.
Yes, I'll check how the result looks like, and will probably change
that.
> Also any good reason for the __copy_from_user instead of the normal
> copy_from_user here?
I don't see any reason. If I remember correctly the only difference is
zero padding, and that wouldn't hurt at all here.
Will check and change.
Thank you for taking a look!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 15:43 [PATCH 0/4] s390: set_fs() removal Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] s390/zcrypt: remove set_fs() invocation in zcrypt device driver Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] s390/dis: get rid of set_fs() usage Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 15:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-15 16:55 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2020-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] s390/uaccess: implement HAVE_GET_KERNEL_NOFAULT support Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] s390/uaccess: remove set_fs() interface Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-15 16:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 19:37 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-09-16 12:36 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-11-25 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-25 8:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-11-25 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200915165517.GC11180@osiris \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.