From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@oracle.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dm: unconditionally call blk_queue_split() in dm_process_bio()
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 21:28:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916012813.GA23236@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916010817.GB791425@T590>
On Tue, Sep 15 2020 at 9:08pm -0400,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > blk_queue_split() has become compulsory from .submit_bio -- regardless
> > of whether it is recursing. Update DM core to always call
> > blk_queue_split().
> >
> > dm_queue_split() is removed because __split_and_process_bio() handles
> > splitting as needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/dm.c | 45 +--------------------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> > index fb0255d25e4b..0bae9f26dc8e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> > @@ -1530,22 +1530,6 @@ static int __send_write_zeroes(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *ti)
> > return __send_changing_extent_only(ci, ti, get_num_write_zeroes_bios(ti));
> > }
> >
> > -static bool is_abnormal_io(struct bio *bio)
> > -{
> > - bool r = false;
> > -
> > - switch (bio_op(bio)) {
> > - case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> > - case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
> > - case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
> > - case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> > - r = true;
> > - break;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return r;
> > -}
> > -
> > static bool __process_abnormal_io(struct clone_info *ci, struct dm_target *ti,
> > int *result)
> > {
> > @@ -1723,23 +1707,6 @@ static blk_qc_t __process_bio(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *map,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static void dm_queue_split(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_target *ti, struct bio **bio)
> > -{
> > - unsigned len, sector_count;
> > -
> > - sector_count = bio_sectors(*bio);
> > - len = min_t(sector_t, max_io_len((*bio)->bi_iter.bi_sector, ti), sector_count);
> > -
> > - if (sector_count > len) {
> > - struct bio *split = bio_split(*bio, len, GFP_NOIO, &md->queue->bio_split);
> > -
> > - bio_chain(split, *bio);
> > - trace_block_split(md->queue, split, (*bio)->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> > - submit_bio_noacct(*bio);
> > - *bio = split;
> > - }
> > -}
> > -
> > static blk_qc_t dm_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
> > struct dm_table *map, struct bio *bio)
> > {
> > @@ -1759,17 +1726,7 @@ static blk_qc_t dm_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * If in ->queue_bio we need to use blk_queue_split(), otherwise
> > - * queue_limits for abnormal requests (e.g. discard, writesame, etc)
> > - * won't be imposed.
> > - */
> > - if (current->bio_list) {
> > - if (is_abnormal_io(bio))
> > - blk_queue_split(&bio);
> > - else
> > - dm_queue_split(md, ti, &bio);
> > - }
> > + blk_queue_split(&bio);
>
> In max_io_len(), target boundary is taken into account when figuring out
> the max io len. However, this info won't be used any more after
> switching to blk_queue_split(). Is that one potential problem?
Thanks for your review. But no, as the patch header says:
"dm_queue_split() is removed because __split_and_process_bio() handles
splitting as needed."
(__split_and_process_non_flush calls max_io_len, as does
__process_abnormal_io by calling __send_changing_extent_only)
SO the blk_queue_split() bio will be further split if needed (due to
DM target boundary, etc).
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 17:23 [PATCH v2 0/4] block: a couple chunk_sectors fixes/improvements Mike Snitzer
2020-09-15 17:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-15 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] block: use lcm_not_zero() when stacking chunk_sectors Mike Snitzer
2020-09-15 17:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-15 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] block: allow 'chunk_sectors' to be non-power-of-2 Mike Snitzer
2020-09-15 17:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-15 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dm table: stack 'chunk_sectors' limit to account for target-specific splitting Mike Snitzer
2020-09-15 17:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-15 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] dm: unconditionally call blk_queue_split() in dm_process_bio() Mike Snitzer
2020-09-15 17:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-16 1:08 ` Ming Lei
2020-09-16 1:28 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-09-16 1:48 ` Ming Lei
2020-09-16 3:39 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-16 7:51 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200916012813.GA23236@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=vijayendra.suman@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.