From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94413C43464 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519E6208C3 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726806AbgIROBc (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:01:32 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:43474 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726199AbgIROBb (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:01:31 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kJGx2-00FF6N-UQ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:01:24 +0200 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:01:24 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: =?utf-8?B?5YqJ5YGJ5qyK?= Cc: "hkallweit1@gmail.com" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux@armlinux.org.uk" , "kuba@kernel.org" , Ryan Kao , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: realtek: Replace 2.5Gbps name from RTL8125 to RTL8226 Message-ID: <20200918140124.GD3631014@lunn.ch> References: <1600306748-3176-1-git-send-email-willy.liu@realtek.com> <20200917134007.GN3526428@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 09:02:43AM +0000, 劉偉權 wrote: > Hi Andrew, > Thanks for your information. Should I do any modifications to make this patch be applied? Please do not to post. And wrap your text to about 75 characters. Since i think you are new to posting to netdev, we tend to be generous to start with, and allow minor process errors. But we do expect you to learn from what we say, and watch other patches on netdev, so that future patches do follow the processes. So please get [PATCH v] correct in your next patches, include a summary of what has changed between versions, etc. I guess David will accept this patch. If not, he will tell you why and what you need to improve. Andrew