All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix uninitialised variable in intel_context_create_request.
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:19:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200918171940.GC716636@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200918111208.1392128-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:12:08PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> In case backoff fails with an error, we return an undefined rq,
> assign err to rq correctly.
> 
> Fixes: 8a929c9eb1c2 ("drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request()")
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> index d301dda1b261..92a3f25c4006 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> @@ -472,6 +472,7 @@ struct i915_request *intel_context_create_request(struct intel_context *ce)
>  		err = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
>  		if (!err)
>  			goto retry;
> +		rq = ERR_PTR(err);

The mix with "err" and rq handling both request and err is a bit confusing
ihmo and prone to misses like this.

I wonder if we also need this before the goto retry as well...
but anyway it looks better than before with no rq assigment on this block...


Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>



>  	} else {
>  		rq = ERR_PTR(err);
>  	}
> 
> base-commit: 5887fa2d8b9b7f6a278f9a1bc8642cb9d5d0279a
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-18 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18 11:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix uninitialised variable in intel_context_create_request Maarten Lankhorst
2020-09-18 13:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-09-18 16:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-09-18 17:19 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2020-09-21  9:24   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200918171940.GC716636@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.