From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] iio:trigger: Remove re-poll logic.
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:18:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200920191814.4a7e8a25@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78141dee-33a2-c28d-2e80-38918c03f81d@metafoo.de>
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:02:32 +0200
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> wrote:
> On 9/20/20 3:25 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> >
> > This code isn't used by any current mainline drivers (except
> > via error handling routes that shouldn't exist). The original
> > user is long gone. It is causing issues, so let's drop it.
> >
> > The main bulk of this mini-series is renaming the function to account
> > for the change in what it does.
> >
> > Lars, what impact does doing this have on your patches to mark hrtimer
> > and irq_work as expiring in hardirq context? I got a bit lost in the
> > discussion of that series, beyond figuring out his corner needed cleaning up.
>
> I think no impact. This is an issue that is orthogonal. I think the
> patches should still be applied as they are.
>
> For this series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
>
Great. Hopefully resolving this one will get us acks on that series.
I've just posted a quick note in that thread to point at this one as resolving
the latter part of that discussion.
Thanks,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-20 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-20 13:25 [PATCH 0/2] iio:trigger: Remove re-poll logic Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-20 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: Fix: Do not poll the driver again if try_reenable() callback returns non 0 Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-20 13:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio:trigger: rename try_reenable() to reenable() plus return void Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-23 15:04 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2020-09-29 20:40 ` Linus Walleij
2020-09-20 15:02 ` [PATCH 0/2] iio:trigger: Remove re-poll logic Lars-Peter Clausen
2020-09-20 18:18 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-11-29 13:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200920191814.4a7e8a25@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=ceggers@arri.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.