From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731E3C4346E for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A06F21D91 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:43:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2A06F21D91 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8906E525; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA5E6E50C; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1FC5D68B05; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:43:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:43:12 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Minchan Kim Message-ID: <20200921184312.GA4415@lst.de> References: <20200918163724.2511-1-hch@lst.de> <20200918163724.2511-2-hch@lst.de> <20200921174256.GA387368@google.com> <20200921181708.GA2067@lst.de> <20200921184229.GA422329@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200921184229.GA422329@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] zsmalloc: switch from alloc_vm_area to get_vm_area X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Peter Zijlstra , Boris Ostrovsky , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Andrew Morton , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Nitin Gupta Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:42:29AM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote: > It seems zsmalloc is only customer the function so let's have the helper > when we see another customer. > > If we don't have objection, I'd like to ask to Andrew fold this up. Fine with me. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090AEC4346E for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B81D82084C for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:43:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B81D82084C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKQmW-0007UY-6z; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:43:20 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKQmU-0007UP-Uw for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:43:18 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 24f2ca8f-77bf-4a23-9688-42ad274ad7c2 Received: from verein.lst.de (unknown [213.95.11.211]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 24f2ca8f-77bf-4a23-9688-42ad274ad7c2; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1FC5D68B05; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:43:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:43:12 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Minchan Kim Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Nitin Gupta , x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] zsmalloc: switch from alloc_vm_area to get_vm_area Message-ID: <20200921184312.GA4415@lst.de> References: <20200918163724.2511-1-hch@lst.de> <20200918163724.2511-2-hch@lst.de> <20200921174256.GA387368@google.com> <20200921181708.GA2067@lst.de> <20200921184229.GA422329@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200921184229.GA422329@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:42:29AM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote: > It seems zsmalloc is only customer the function so let's have the helper > when we see another customer. > > If we don't have objection, I'd like to ask to Andrew fold this up. Fine with me.