From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] xfs: clean up calculation of LR header blocks
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:22:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922152248.GC2175303@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917051341.9811-3-hsiangkao@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:13:41PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Let's use DIV_ROUND_UP() to calculate log record header
> blocks as what did in xlog_get_iclog_buffer_size() and
> wrap up a common helper for log recovery.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200904082516.31205-3-hsiangkao@redhat.com
>
> changes since v2:
> - get rid of xlog_logrecv2_hblks() and use xlog_logrec_hblks()
> entirely (Brian).
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 4 +---
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 48 ++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> index ad0c69ee8947..7a4ba408a3a2 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> @@ -1604,9 +1604,7 @@ xlog_cksum(
> int i;
> int xheads;
>
> - xheads = size / XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE;
> - if (size % XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE)
> - xheads++;
> + xheads = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE);
>
> for (i = 1; i < xheads; i++) {
> crc = crc32c(crc, &xhdr[i].hic_xheader,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> index 782ec3eeab4d..28dd98b5a703 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,18 @@ xlog_find_verify_cycle(
> return error;
> }
>
> +static inline int xlog_logrec_hblks(struct xlog *log, xlog_rec_header_t *rh)
> +{
We're trying to gradually eliminate various structure typedefs so it's
frowned upon to introduce new instances. If you replace the above with
'struct xlog_rec_header,' the rest looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> + if (xfs_sb_version_haslogv2(&log->l_mp->m_sb)) {
> + int h_size = be32_to_cpu(rh->h_size);
> +
> + if ((be32_to_cpu(rh->h_version) & XLOG_VERSION_2) &&
> + h_size > XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE)
> + return DIV_ROUND_UP(h_size, XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE);
> + }
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Potentially backup over partial log record write.
> *
> @@ -463,15 +475,7 @@ xlog_find_verify_log_record(
> * reset last_blk. Only when last_blk points in the middle of a log
> * record do we update last_blk.
> */
> - if (xfs_sb_version_haslogv2(&log->l_mp->m_sb)) {
> - uint h_size = be32_to_cpu(head->h_size);
> -
> - xhdrs = h_size / XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE;
> - if (h_size % XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE)
> - xhdrs++;
> - } else {
> - xhdrs = 1;
> - }
> + xhdrs = xlog_logrec_hblks(log, head);
>
> if (*last_blk - i + extra_bblks !=
> BTOBB(be32_to_cpu(head->h_len)) + xhdrs)
> @@ -1158,22 +1162,7 @@ xlog_check_unmount_rec(
> * below. We won't want to clear the unmount record if there is one, so
> * we pass the lsn of the unmount record rather than the block after it.
> */
> - if (xfs_sb_version_haslogv2(&log->l_mp->m_sb)) {
> - int h_size = be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_size);
> - int h_version = be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_version);
> -
> - if ((h_version & XLOG_VERSION_2) &&
> - (h_size > XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE)) {
> - hblks = h_size / XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE;
> - if (h_size % XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE)
> - hblks++;
> - } else {
> - hblks = 1;
> - }
> - } else {
> - hblks = 1;
> - }
> -
> + hblks = xlog_logrec_hblks(log, rhead);
> after_umount_blk = xlog_wrap_logbno(log,
> rhead_blk + hblks + BTOBB(be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_len)));
>
> @@ -2989,15 +2978,10 @@ xlog_do_recovery_pass(
> if (error)
> goto bread_err1;
>
> - if ((be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_version) & XLOG_VERSION_2) &&
> - (h_size > XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE)) {
> - hblks = h_size / XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE;
> - if (h_size % XLOG_HEADER_CYCLE_SIZE)
> - hblks++;
> + hblks = xlog_logrec_hblks(log, rhead);
> + if (hblks != 1) {
> kmem_free(hbp);
> hbp = xlog_alloc_buffer(log, hblks);
> - } else {
> - hblks = 1;
> }
> } else {
> ASSERT(log->l_sectBBsize == 1);
> --
> 2.18.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-17 5:13 [PATCH v2 0/2] xfs: random patches on log recovery Gao Xiang
2020-09-17 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] xfs: avoid LR buffer overrun due to crafted h_len Gao Xiang
2020-09-22 15:22 ` Brian Foster
2020-09-22 15:28 ` Gao Xiang
2020-09-23 16:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-23 16:52 ` Gao Xiang
2020-09-17 5:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] xfs: clean up calculation of LR header blocks Gao Xiang
2020-09-22 15:22 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2020-09-22 15:32 ` Gao Xiang
2020-09-22 15:53 ` [PATCH v3.2] " Gao Xiang
2020-09-23 16:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200922152248.GC2175303@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.