From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
sassmann@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
jacob.e.keller@intel.com, jlelli@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org,
mike.marciniszyn@intel.com, dennis.dalessandro@intel.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
mathias.nyman@intel.com, jiri@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch v1 3/3] PCI: Limit pci_alloc_irq_vectors as per housekeeping CPUs
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 23:08:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922210809.GE5217@lenoir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75a398cd-2050-e298-d718-eb56d4910133@redhat.com>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:54:58AM -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
> >> If min_vecs > num_housekeeping, for example:
> >>
> >> /* PCI MSI/MSIx support */
> >> #define XGBE_MSI_BASE_COUNT 4
> >> #define XGBE_MSI_MIN_COUNT (XGBE_MSI_BASE_COUNT + 1)
> >>
> >> Then the protection fails.
> > Right, I was ignoring that case.
> >
> >> How about reducing max_vecs down to min_vecs, if min_vecs >
> >> num_housekeeping ?
> > Yes, I think this makes sense.
> > I will wait a bit to see if anyone else has any other comment and will post
> > the next version then.
> >
>
> Are there any other comments/concerns on this patch that I need to address in
> the next posting?
No objection from me, I don't know much about this area anyway.
> --
> Nitesh
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-09 15:08 [RFC] [PATCH v1 0/3] isolation: limit msix vectors based on housekeeping CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-09 15:08 ` [RFC][Patch v1 1/3] sched/isolation: API to get num of hosekeeping CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-17 18:18 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2020-09-17 18:43 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-17 20:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-17 21:48 ` Jacob Keller
2020-09-17 22:09 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-21 23:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-22 3:16 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-22 10:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-22 13:50 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-22 20:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-22 21:15 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-22 21:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-22 22:20 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-09 15:08 ` [RFC][Patch v1 2/3] i40e: limit msix vectors based on housekeeping CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-11 15:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-09-17 18:23 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2020-09-17 18:31 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-21 22:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-22 3:08 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-22 9:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-22 13:34 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-22 20:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-22 21:05 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-09 15:08 ` [RFC][Patch v1 3/3] PCI: Limit pci_alloc_irq_vectors as per " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-10 19:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-09-10 19:31 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-22 13:54 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-22 21:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200922210809.GE5217@lenoir \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=jlelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@intel.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.