From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470AAC2D0A8 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB36C214D8 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.b="wGO6wcWk"; dkim=temperror (0-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="lZsgw4br" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DB36C214D8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BxMjN4kLzzDqN5 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 01:36:40 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=66.111.4.25; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=wGO6wcWk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=lZsgw4br; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BxMgk3k2MzDq9k for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 01:35:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20115C021E; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:35:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:35:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=wl/GjHWcZJ3oPiKy8ddCFaeONaA vukq0ut4fqO1Zj04=; b=wGO6wcWkE6gzF5kIeh70hlevI07F4J6qClv4SPyBIT9 nMnXQZUw+4zwaz2t6MuH0EZJmkYbJXVcgXBRlE+EVLPbFBV3guD8gOgsWeS4xN05 iMFeLx4qooALxMnly+xw/U9RHY+6hmMGobwD9K3eFSiXyPXyj0264sVhFKTQ75+S xdw3NLr9p8EGiKnoaBSRhBJwvOstzuOzC37+KNLsmh0x/XYg7RGDWvVFGKhxVvly evOoaW87CbLKbZLi7Rh9Szi41JthKxMmkPic2tkMszABp+66f0J6C7hXvpf+gron Ye6U/qGY3uSo7pm1xRUfipWQQ0fE0/uuUqlD0L39f8A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=wl/GjH WcZJ3oPiKy8ddCFaeONaAvukq0ut4fqO1Zj04=; b=lZsgw4br7r5N+xpYRh4Amj iiDaxBgHuHerI6jjgM3Xsjo8sVmI7JQbDXHxOZDPhlLEFctzxT0P8bvTsPSc+B7A wCIrCuhwJP4hfvnfnyASL9rLLJcpIGYHz39X2xntiEjRAD8ClY5XZ77ZSeXENkWA May1dXbU6fDYPLPuSGc1Y4smlueQ5HWRAD2qDAeQpuzkoGWVDwdFIb65K7y/qj/V n2zDLVpF+Wmjhn90TX+pA+vpzVDGL0XwBPS5h8XruaIUhcYdavqlFasnSK5BahiI I7PNSHtKG68X0DYbnGv6Gkdb8U7vO2aB1ebHwNs0ruMvTLNl1GPB7XJx8rwAnATw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeigdeludcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehprghtrhhitghksehsth iftgigrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegheehfeffgeekveehtdfhgfduhfeg fefgtdehhfektdelffevkefgueffhedtieenucfkphepjeeirddvhedtrdekgedrvdefie enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehprght rhhitghksehsthiftgigrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (76-250-84-236.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [76.250.84.236]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E25C93064687; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:35:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:35:10 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Jayashree D Subject: Re: Read Firmware Versions Message-ID: <20200923153510.GP6152@heinlein> References: <20200921152337.GJ6152@heinlein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nVYOjVWOcH+Ezkzp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" , "Velumani T-ERS, HCLTech" Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --nVYOjVWOcH+Ezkzp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 01:34:50PM +0000, Jayashree D wrote: > Classification: HCL Internal >=20 > Thanks Patrick for your response. >=20 > In phosphor-bmc-code-mgmt, I am seeing the software image is upgraded and= based on the image update, version is updated. > But in my platform, I have to read firmware versions using oem commands a= nd that version should be displayed under dbus objects. > Whether phosphor-bmc-code-mgmt repo will be suitable to display the firmw= are version using dbus objects? Vijay recently added a simple BIOS flash management to phosphor-bmc-code-mgmt, but there is also a openpower-pnor-code-mgmt for the equivalent of BIOS management on openpower systems. Since your code update scheme is likely to be specific to your IPMB commands, I don't know if that would be best in a separate repository or an extension onto phosphor-bmc-code-mgmt. Adriana, any opinions? --nVYOjVWOcH+Ezkzp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAl9ray4ACgkQqwNHzC0A wRlKQg//Y//h6dQY/ozDpls+/qOYSEzdu+KJJGmDeZ6SA20pMp4MgWGXCopACSR0 LVOPD9Ohq96YvVyjihNEXFneAqwn3riXTFKr4Kqm/1TchlZ+TXPiwao2bcFmsZNL x5l21OP77JM8aFB1zZ90pSs4Mtc46vlbHFgLXARSrDi81oQWvPbM8tfv7DKwFYmF Oo4r1ObMY1UkAZxPe+kO1PTNxREGpuRlObTmVju7IDGXjb1nNn6MPEYXp6h5q6G+ qaywyw2aNtLperiqWncW3tbfngOFECYu779bF8/w4SpqIkN3CAdz9trhlEVbYD3Y Rasqg0fMiF1sQfWMRFNdlQGbj2zTyov2lFif5Tdo9UkDxk7rqUVYkPuQoXq4Zbef pONuZMRbGy/oNlWRePh0I+XAjP181iepwyveAwTIoRFHLLdqRMhK++9cguIUWW/R Et0iSTZ7ukeSZ4Ib2oFSaaLp1pNeWlm5Zu1jayJ67g0C9bOOYolV259+llA91D3N Bl55EphnBBybDr8VzRrV28pbLHbQ8e84aqlYoi6mll2Ow3xW2Ms5YpPpo8o8T80/ 3Uf6VoKdZbQwK4dEu9A1rR0rg6dVyFi19rkmx+I4k6EGjZfNoFs4H0zr/keJnPJu W96ryXCZEVRIZ3bWexD1d4eJ7iJfhftYVBsvqyiYF9QHo0r5+go= =zGY3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nVYOjVWOcH+Ezkzp--