From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776E6C4363D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64E11208B8 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.b="lKJqRNsu"; dkim=temperror (0-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="eJHLmXoG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 64E11208B8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bxb8R5xmczDqcG for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:12:23 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=64.147.123.21; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=lKJqRNsu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=eJHLmXoG; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bxb6t53j6zDqKr for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:11:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7291DB05; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:10:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:10:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=5RCXIh1mYur+tCF/uTt1VipfDb7 VokZfk23i2Phtw2U=; b=lKJqRNsuj/v7p/VDC8zG6eaKAjd3NX//JZ3oHDS7uhZ K2JJrkQCRq0VdS+qAhCGb3zgy5aMb3af+03o5cXRYBRFyOjyGys/Y/rzdRoVA/Ho I/Bdy3eCxpLGkO6qLvzKDLwk+k3OYrJOF4U7r19I5eJuwALAIZ72e6mm/4P2Klrk jiDKdhJ42QGth7TZ8gnen3IeH4QHnOpCDfw457CEepwSEr4cqPmykMPLddheAooa ZEihnz3qMObIrUN1r+m8hEAjxETz62Dw2D09SOBhbKCeHcSDxr0hPSe0DMwUOece YvREYymt/3cPLHIL31bx1kkkSv1u24J+bZLpd1OVEWQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=5RCXIh 1mYur+tCF/uTt1VipfDb7VokZfk23i2Phtw2U=; b=eJHLmXoGF8l38frrjCtMYY 5ePunrEFhSeOQq7QGEg17MUKym09RAZf1m+0Xw9KfMz0b48XxlMr0nTPwbIg0xg8 tRJaUiH2tfrIpKnT4C8lT3cROqU+lqjvNVC4ZUWxuj+WIJmku/78SlqTAVLxDOvR OJ4UBdY0Aass9t7dxWZ59h6qraSOkeZVzM6tn/fLRkNQ33ctrT48two08TMYY5sR oJ4vmXQuxu8xLbBajGZQrEX4U8EO8GOwxreXzNPv6O3cKzqzV9bVcv1UE568z8ec OmLBk/wzoqPF8zTDk9EwwSQ3OwShcgCVqFXICtzD0IQQSWYH79LkJqM7nrMTCXRw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudejgddvlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculddvfedmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttdej necuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehprghtrhhitghksehsth iftgigrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekvdehudevkefhuedvteethfeflefh vdehiefgudegvdfggfetffevkeetudegudenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtoh hmnecukfhppeejiedrvdehtddrkeegrddvfeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgrthhrihgtkhesshhtfigtgidrgiihii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (76-250-84-236.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [76.250.84.236]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 108E13064680; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:10:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:10:55 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Cheng Yang Subject: Re: Difficulty booting on Raspberry Pi 4. Message-ID: <20200924001055.GW6152@heinlein> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tuYRN1zEaS85jg/Y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --tuYRN1zEaS85jg/Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:36:03AM -0700, Cheng Yang wrote: > Hi, I=E2=80=99m openbmc noob here. Welcome. > I follow the instruction of https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/blob/maste= r/meta-raspberrypi/README.md I don't think there are really many people using the meta-raspberrypi with OpenBMC. This comes from elsewhere outside the project as one of the Yocto community meta-layers and isn't related to OpenBMC. What happened was that someone had an idea to use a rpi as an easily-accessible experimental platform for running OpenBMC code and they asked to have the meta-layer added to our tree. We keep it in sync, but I don't think that experiment really went much farther. See https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/399 for some of the origin. If you're doing just a simple rpi4 image build, without any of the OpenBMC layers, and it won't even boot, that seems like something you could tackle with the upstream community. The README suggests that the general Yocto mailing list is where to go: ``` * Mailing list (yocto mailing list): ``` --=20 Patrick Williams --tuYRN1zEaS85jg/Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAl9r5A0ACgkQqwNHzC0A wRldAA/+MPNKVyV7ldUlOmxDCoHAp6ZOT5jLj5poQHLU8/hF2FDv9y7zYmdXbpj7 uz+FZuBEcYTQ1FGLT/xOD+sgouLMGuFfg6mQZFg991NDrkkhBsnC/b1bmRxu2Muc UZN8l8hK5oosVwN/AI0sb9Z5TbssD+DY0+1UFMT/vlPJsBCUFE0NHZzPi0oBp/xb 6TUPLRKp5TeohZVN1o/m2Tv3FSr46zDCXAnqK5KSvUDTOg4rrWosy47REU0xo40J MlVkuuqKvm8FatgfF5eRFAYBmaHdUh7imGB+qR6F5JY5XQ1V7Rb0k3oOd3Xi6n0H MUrBHyB/ZYryHYMvGmaRf9SL0tWArvR1HeTvKwEohfEwwbOjOAyVWU12Ku5a666o bmQEwc69sK2HVBC48sYhVcDjXdPmmARijpsw7FneAoWXgKOeL36uzd1o9NXWmWqa E+xSom+sQcDTEQhuzuMap/LBBsmJnHVYEEuidXQ08xI+GHP3CqcgQEXgISAC+cRJ UZFy+ZdfJZaAXp99N5CKs0Pn4uZ9E1qefVM2jM9FKZvfaKGLI/MjGZ2v1rNdJHGt e9MNL+yKDtupObZ75N/F98ozfiqUSE1lXgYSXHkrg6hi+ZbP4/R+4AJ08ktXTJw+ NYfEW39kK1A0trSZ2zb3ubcZq2N7vAgJcNQy1BeKb48AGHNmiOU= =g+Bi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tuYRN1zEaS85jg/Y--