From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4164C4363D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2435E206C9 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WoTtA2E2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2435E206C9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA169854C0; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DUZPyxyICc4P; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447C285374; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B67EC0859; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80857C0051 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75985874BB for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihrQWVFk7Pav for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B2A872D6 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600940303; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GQMLt7r4p28L0sSJJPMjF6juRbduNigBdA5Pg+z0Rro=; b=WoTtA2E2mX+8s1wtC8/nTjHU/aDj88CpLWVhtWoLxMm+K6oeYehARwUpm0kVgWA6yi//e+ 2laNguNMYzYrlLKPWg6nzU7Xz7tvXji7nHGTdTpZ4YyL81w/L2qu6HEZZk0GWyilLA/D1D 9Sbg2nRGUNjDfz0pLYVZZg1tOOohktk= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-98-F2AIbOEHPcKjzsXmVmGUqA-1; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:38:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: F2AIbOEHPcKjzsXmVmGUqA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id x6so1024312wmi.1 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=GQMLt7r4p28L0sSJJPMjF6juRbduNigBdA5Pg+z0Rro=; b=Tj3STBFZWwfG2N7a1PDkjlXP8sWyXt1IE38a96yzyqILymGkBEFTEKVMffHxGW0HEK 8Zf412SR+dHgtCSBGbBxPQXLhJqjlJsmFi+PMeRdXwp4A0R8uQi4n5Adx3avFcPt71ZW 86DtzuvHLkbGXA5VPt+fgy9q4NI4URbfMkoQykDBJcJish6cyXcFHkZLAE4LQBekx7Ev ECRILgLj+3Wuj5AaRFNzy0LifNb5HNWmewFiGVyHrq335uuaxhppdGHkefZagf9P6+dT 2ndI+DTATysQfii6kCjjERhCjH8WB45esxcJL+HHQkgSiz1WtTSFLCWIdiDGjkEz11Cg xiNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kZTK0bGWkDHZeWiGIStoQWhLeI6C+h4iLCcqJmt57WyYhqFqy Io2SS73npqzLp+blvn6En4aNsPGBtUKZ0uHBI+Zm2BOoGj7ABl75HuCQzV7iak+rXRg9WLkxO7x x6pmoqFBYpLmT1UAu7xSL7PONTUAGHQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:568d:: with SMTP id f13mr4007444wrv.303.1600940298005; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNfu1dfe6iZYDmyztM8WdEywh/avjWGmq3NjwJSF1cAVd6SUgRkwNdlaUiQJUtrdpjEEYZSA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:568d:: with SMTP id f13mr4007413wrv.303.1600940297782; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-79-179-71-128.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.71.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c205sm2730814wmd.33.2020.09.24.02.38.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:38:13 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology Message-ID: <20200924053159-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200821131540.2801801-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200924045958-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200924092129.GH27174@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200924092129.GH27174@8bytes.org> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mst@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, Jean-Philippe Brucker , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jasowang@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, sebastien.boeuf@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:00:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > OK so this looks good. Can you pls repost with the minor tweak > > suggested and all acks included, and I will queue this? > > My NACK still stands, as long as a few questions are open: > > 1) The format used here will be the same as in the ACPI table? I > think the answer to this questions must be Yes, so this leads > to the real question: I am not sure it's a must. We can always tweak the parser if there are slight differences between ACPI and virtio formats. But we do want the virtio format used here to be approved by the virtio TC, so it won't change. Eric, Jean-Philippe, does one of you intend to create a github issue and request a ballot for the TC? It's been posted end of August with no changes ... > 2) Has the ACPI table format stabalized already? If and only if > the answer is Yes I will Ack these patches. We don't need to > wait until the ACPI table format is published in a > specification update, but at least some certainty that it > will not change in incompatible ways anymore is needed. > Not that I know, but I don't see why it's a must. > So what progress has been made with the ACPI table specification, is it > just a matter of time to get it approved or are there concerns? > > Regards, > > Joerg _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29EDC4363D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D24F206B6 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="TwA14iCq" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726412AbgIXJiW (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:38:22 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:48554 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726380AbgIXJiW (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:38:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600940300; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GQMLt7r4p28L0sSJJPMjF6juRbduNigBdA5Pg+z0Rro=; b=TwA14iCqybqth1d1SG2Ws9xyZp3lFSA6JZRWUTIbtEfolXMa+SwWh3GDWwBUXBbIkVdlv/ GDmzKpq+OBrRRBjYxeertDy28tXqQ34ba711kV2sbk6pkyJ5pMqVF9ubleDUV8f5uRsrjk Q6aUL12SOGRyhypUxbQyM8W7gqO10QU= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-199--Y3gkqG9P66DfIW5SK8r8g-1; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:38:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -Y3gkqG9P66DfIW5SK8r8g-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id m25so1028225wmi.0 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=GQMLt7r4p28L0sSJJPMjF6juRbduNigBdA5Pg+z0Rro=; b=uhG8RY6+Qg8O/dF2sbcFBkw4XBHOhZyOlT1Tej1DxLqcin/G0YVNFblAlIcp2KtqsY 2ypznm1XJo7oEftTVqp1dwVIUeycpZa5t6EwiONqT5gIeQ9TT7y287kk9tR10SgldceE CapfLuxzKLZliDDUc4JOHK5ELznJ7SLxNtISSu4es+xd1rdDFvAvVmcH9573RMfkJU9B eAbDF2SS1EQvXxzvUQ8IFG3SJENlgcPTn7ImDOolvzQalCB5QP6O6vaR7W3DXsh6bE0B b1QwSiifSWy9+wItTtnoIltgSQuK/kzIrcySLpQhe00N4yPs9a0qwK45umGdJ0U/R/ao /G0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TV8KvKtaDpVVgVBC4AHJhuRAeL63h+akzwHA7NhBocY8Nul43 ZfgbgPc4EIbfPTtkzW4p1I/Ky1JmZCB/2m0zyPd+5TXZmnzvTLAeyoc4yX18/NC/MjrPGbwfiXr eCDx1eAErLk4WdhCRkPx5 X-Received: by 2002:a5d:568d:: with SMTP id f13mr4007445wrv.303.1600940298005; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNfu1dfe6iZYDmyztM8WdEywh/avjWGmq3NjwJSF1cAVd6SUgRkwNdlaUiQJUtrdpjEEYZSA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:568d:: with SMTP id f13mr4007413wrv.303.1600940297782; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-79-179-71-128.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.71.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c205sm2730814wmd.33.2020.09.24.02.38.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:38:13 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Auger Eric , Jean-Philippe Brucker , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, jasowang@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, sebastien.boeuf@intel.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology Message-ID: <20200924053159-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200821131540.2801801-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200924045958-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200924092129.GH27174@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200924092129.GH27174@8bytes.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:00:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > OK so this looks good. Can you pls repost with the minor tweak > > suggested and all acks included, and I will queue this? > > My NACK still stands, as long as a few questions are open: > > 1) The format used here will be the same as in the ACPI table? I > think the answer to this questions must be Yes, so this leads > to the real question: I am not sure it's a must. We can always tweak the parser if there are slight differences between ACPI and virtio formats. But we do want the virtio format used here to be approved by the virtio TC, so it won't change. Eric, Jean-Philippe, does one of you intend to create a github issue and request a ballot for the TC? It's been posted end of August with no changes ... > 2) Has the ACPI table format stabalized already? If and only if > the answer is Yes I will Ack these patches. We don't need to > wait until the ACPI table format is published in a > specification update, but at least some certainty that it > will not change in incompatible ways anymore is needed. > Not that I know, but I don't see why it's a must. > So what progress has been made with the ACPI table specification, is it > just a matter of time to get it approved or are there concerns? > > Regards, > > Joerg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: virtio-dev-return-7803-cohuck=redhat.com@lists.oasis-open.org Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05357985D89 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:38:13 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20200924053159-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200821131540.2801801-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200924045958-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200924092129.GH27174@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200924092129.GH27174@8bytes.org> Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Auger Eric , Jean-Philippe Brucker , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, jasowang@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, sebastien.boeuf@intel.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com List-ID: On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:00:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > OK so this looks good. Can you pls repost with the minor tweak > > suggested and all acks included, and I will queue this? > > My NACK still stands, as long as a few questions are open: > > 1) The format used here will be the same as in the ACPI table? I > think the answer to this questions must be Yes, so this leads > to the real question: I am not sure it's a must. We can always tweak the parser if there are slight differences between ACPI and virtio formats. But we do want the virtio format used here to be approved by the virtio TC, so it won't change. Eric, Jean-Philippe, does one of you intend to create a github issue and request a ballot for the TC? It's been posted end of August with no changes ... > 2) Has the ACPI table format stabalized already? If and only if > the answer is Yes I will Ack these patches. We don't need to > wait until the ACPI table format is published in a > specification update, but at least some certainty that it > will not change in incompatible ways anymore is needed. > Not that I know, but I don't see why it's a must. > So what progress has been made with the ACPI table specification, is it > just a matter of time to get it approved or are there concerns? > > Regards, > > Joerg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6A0C4363D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 164E3206B6 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WoTtA2E2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 164E3206B6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F433869B7; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VtSU3M7yRMLb; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950EA845D4; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FA3C1AD7; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69FAC0051 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947B6872D6 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bVP59KaD243b for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D5FF87497 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:38:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600940303; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GQMLt7r4p28L0sSJJPMjF6juRbduNigBdA5Pg+z0Rro=; b=WoTtA2E2mX+8s1wtC8/nTjHU/aDj88CpLWVhtWoLxMm+K6oeYehARwUpm0kVgWA6yi//e+ 2laNguNMYzYrlLKPWg6nzU7Xz7tvXji7nHGTdTpZ4YyL81w/L2qu6HEZZk0GWyilLA/D1D 9Sbg2nRGUNjDfz0pLYVZZg1tOOohktk= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-199-P7pw9pk6OuuCiRS_VY_wpg-1; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:38:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: P7pw9pk6OuuCiRS_VY_wpg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id u5so1017978wme.3 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=GQMLt7r4p28L0sSJJPMjF6juRbduNigBdA5Pg+z0Rro=; b=tEzV83nLfVnFgEauxE5xJ1YTZUU0F5LQdA+ULIi6OYabnILGBps41KZw7QEhuWc9jP PNGJEPFORO6ypuIJZdjmuGdR5ntD/Ddt9qRUAQ8iyABVSmXR0bEniQpTnwK+RPwdom0Z exU+ehjH0RW9s7Ax7K8Gn3aim/htP3o07lx8h9YwAuRcBCzxSDjQEh0RJM19g8ZSBX00 8jH2DlWT0hnmJiXXmsdc6y3zh4vfXz5Ybv7dymDA0/7Fr/SraRp+KvY43yBypYkqnccW 5ma1eMGQuFo6JxHqu9507oP3nbFlTim3v55de6lmVTZVgmaGdUSOHreszBuZJ2iFaI83 0aJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vKVUPt4TLVTA9GgIGAZeEjVZZ9Tq2/RlqmpKOTXx+mFbivhk4 sFLNwPEnsu5m4zL42Favz6mFbEASLV4CJeNTBXEudncKDhjnzlZ6qN92AgWxUMOiD722LA/Jl7W u62Fc+VkwI1plE34m/g2mSyj2+5+X31a1qVAuFcXrPA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:568d:: with SMTP id f13mr4007446wrv.303.1600940298005; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNfu1dfe6iZYDmyztM8WdEywh/avjWGmq3NjwJSF1cAVd6SUgRkwNdlaUiQJUtrdpjEEYZSA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:568d:: with SMTP id f13mr4007413wrv.303.1600940297782; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-79-179-71-128.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.71.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c205sm2730814wmd.33.2020.09.24.02.38.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 02:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:38:13 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add virtio-iommu built-in topology Message-ID: <20200924053159-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200821131540.2801801-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200924045958-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200924092129.GH27174@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200924092129.GH27174@8bytes.org> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mst@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, Jean-Philippe Brucker , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Auger Eric , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, sebastien.boeuf@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:00:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > OK so this looks good. Can you pls repost with the minor tweak > > suggested and all acks included, and I will queue this? > > My NACK still stands, as long as a few questions are open: > > 1) The format used here will be the same as in the ACPI table? I > think the answer to this questions must be Yes, so this leads > to the real question: I am not sure it's a must. We can always tweak the parser if there are slight differences between ACPI and virtio formats. But we do want the virtio format used here to be approved by the virtio TC, so it won't change. Eric, Jean-Philippe, does one of you intend to create a github issue and request a ballot for the TC? It's been posted end of August with no changes ... > 2) Has the ACPI table format stabalized already? If and only if > the answer is Yes I will Ack these patches. We don't need to > wait until the ACPI table format is published in a > specification update, but at least some certainty that it > will not change in incompatible ways anymore is needed. > Not that I know, but I don't see why it's a must. > So what progress has been made with the ACPI table specification, is it > just a matter of time to get it approved or are there concerns? > > Regards, > > Joerg _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization