From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D785BC4727E for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF9C23A32 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="g9cLhrnR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5EF9C23A32 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ByjTt63W3zDqjR for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 06:01:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1042; helo=mail-pj1-x1042.google.com; envelope-from=keescook@chromium.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=g9cLhrnR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pj1-x1042.google.com (mail-pj1-x1042.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1042]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ByjS359qqzDqdM for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:59:47 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1042.google.com with SMTP id b17so76887pji.1 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:59:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Ggl98Rof0DqS698qrdY9hreKRXA7T3yDj8NdjFuxFs0=; b=g9cLhrnRgqES/eJBfO3BCZ6hOeD4DoeH2QwAFtDPEoKoLEBcMNbcUiBhw3l99z3HIP 96ai0RhzG1Eb62LlVkF8a0W2GSzYQVEf6UCRyxons3F53BAdEp5Q0g+oYUGk5zeW9JL6 OppLGwbMhjgRG3mdThm6083xezOmWzEmC4jPE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Ggl98Rof0DqS698qrdY9hreKRXA7T3yDj8NdjFuxFs0=; b=cf1uti1k0HGaK0k4TPIDh9RhA3rJEZyt2ZJb2CrU58OFQMc5OYa8XmBYsBcHNGasWd Yt4BHdeGuyy1FIlAGzLNMoRCIqAf7W+zCOXP90D+9rC68Z3/14BXy3ci86mwxyTGenSZ DXnR9T8Y9t764olV5JWgRCMsIO+9NBM4GY5l+QtsbqbOiF9xvSINzRqRrCXGVV3zqU9G kGMVCW1r1Ase3679yU2aJGUWatzVOXEcUpZb1dpZbzHY1Qqfnm8RhMaICzEiVDzo4EGW wCDOse0tjTZKPN6Ohs/LOXQV44rzp/BeioDPKNrWhd55FKkXNMxqiTzYqPyQgJoiHYNX isSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HTkmFnzNEQtCcEvEUnV/F1cArjZDm2yu4izMFbMCVIx7YgWDG a9g6jVxLvcKISiknIv/ow5kurA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3KLTZE90Cp/pFBvJWB9BSZkzrKvyRZzuIpHlgJhtA8ikMd7V7mVN5rs4E/EFRJOIBEopblQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:86c2:: with SMTP id y2mr193950pjv.3.1601063984152; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l14sm3120361pfc.170.2020.09.25.12.59.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:59:42 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Ganesh Goudar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/lkdtm: Enable selftest for SLB multihit Message-ID: <202009251257.52EAF495@keescook> References: <20200925103123.21102-1-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com> <20200925103123.21102-4-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200925103123.21102-4-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: msuchanek@suse.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mahesh@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 04:01:23PM +0530, Ganesh Goudar wrote: > Add PPC_SLB_MULTIHIT to lkdtm selftest framework. > > Signed-off-by: Ganesh Goudar > --- > tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt > index 9d266e79c6a2..7eb3cf91c89e 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt > @@ -70,3 +70,4 @@ USERCOPY_KERNEL > USERCOPY_KERNEL_DS > STACKLEAK_ERASING OK: the rest of the thread stack is properly erased > CFI_FORWARD_PROTO > +PPC_SLB_MULTIHIT Recovered Please squash this into the lkdtm patch -- I'd like test implementation and kselftest awareness to go in together. -- Kees Cook