Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:32:05 +0200
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:18:55 +0200
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:13:49 -0400
> > Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Collin Walling wrote:    
> > > > On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > >       
> > > >>>      
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks, applied.
> > > >>
> > > >>      
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks Conny.
> > > > 
> > > > Much appreciated for everyone's patience and review. The only
> > > > thing I'd like to hold out on for now is for someone to take a
> > > > peek at patch #3 with respect to the protected virtualization
> > > > stuff. I don't know too much about it, honestly, and I want to
> > > > ensure that dynamically allocating memory for the SCCB makes
> > > > sense there. The alternative would be to allocate a static 4K for
> > > > the work_sccb.   
> > > 
> > > I had someone take a look at the patch for PV and was told
> > > everything looks sane. Since the patches have already been applied,
> > > it seems like it's too late to add a reviewed-by from someone?    
> > 
> > Have the reviewer reply with their R-b, and I'll happily add it, as I
> > rebase s390-next before doing a pull req anyway :)  
> 
> well it was me :)
> 
> you can add a 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> for the first 6 patches, and an
> 
> Acked-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> for the last one
> 
> 
> thanks!
> 

Thanks, updated and pushed out.