From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tsoni@codeaurora.org,
psodagud@codeaurora.org, sidgup@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] remoteproc: Move coredump configuration to sysfs
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:32:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200926033201.GB10036@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1600449731-3056-2-git-send-email-rishabhb@codeaurora.org>
On Fri 18 Sep 10:22 PDT 2020, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
[..]
> +static ssize_t coredump_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev);
> +
> + if (rproc->state == RPROC_CRASHED) {
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "can't change coredump configuration\n");
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + if (sysfs_streq(buf, "disable")) {
As pointed out by Sibi (somewhere) this should be "disabled" to match
what's returned in coredump_show() and what goes into the recovery
file.
> + rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_DISABLED;
> + } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "inline")) {
> + rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_INLINE;
> + } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "default")) {
As I pointed out in a previous review, I think it makes sense to change
the default for dump_conf to "disabled" (a separate change). But in
doing so using the word "default" in the sysfs interface would be
misleading - and once it's part of sysfs it stays.
So how about changing this to "enabled"?
PS. The change of the default value of dump_conf would, in line with
Mathieu's ask, be a separate/unrelated change.
Regards,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-26 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-18 17:22 [PATCH v5 0/2] Move recovery/coredump configuration to sysfs Rishabh Bhatnagar
2020-09-18 17:22 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] remoteproc: Move coredump " Rishabh Bhatnagar
2020-09-26 3:32 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2020-09-18 17:22 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] remoteproc: Move recovery " Rishabh Bhatnagar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200926033201.GB10036@builder.lan \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rishabhb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sidgup@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.