CC: kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org In-Reply-To: <20200926042453.67517-3-john.stultz@linaro.org> References: <20200926042453.67517-3-john.stultz@linaro.org> TO: John Stultz Hi John, [FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.] [auto build test WARNING on linux/master] [also build test WARNING on tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next linus/master next-20200925] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/John-Stultz/dma-buf-Performance-improvements-for-system-heap/20200926-122541 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git bcf876870b95592b52519ed4aafcf9d95999bc9c :::::: branch date: 6 hours ago :::::: commit date: 6 hours ago config: x86_64-randconfig-c002-20200925 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Julia Lawall coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c:203:2-8: preceding lock on line 200 drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c:208:2-8: preceding lock on line 200 -- >> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c:119:5-8: Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "0" on line 131 Please review and possibly fold the followup patch. --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org