From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@nxp.com>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, sudeep.dutt@intel.com,
ashutosh.dixit@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kishon@ti.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] misc: vop: simply return the saved dma address instead of virt_to_phys
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:26:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200929102643.GC7784@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929084425.24052-4-sherry.sun@nxp.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 04:44:24PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
> The device page and vring should use consistent memory which are
> allocated by dma_alloc_coherent api, when user space wants to get its
> physical address, virt_to_phys cannot be used, should simply return the
> saved device page dma address by get_dp_dma callback and the vring dma
> address saved in mic_vqconfig.
More importantly you can't just all virt_to_phys on a return value
from dma_alloc_coherent, so this needs to be folded into patch 1.
> if (!offset) {
> - *pa = virt_to_phys(vpdev->hw_ops->get_dp(vpdev));
> + if (vpdev->hw_ops->get_dp_dma)
> + *pa = vpdev->hw_ops->get_dp_dma(vpdev);
> + else {
> + dev_err(vop_dev(vdev), "can't get device page physical address\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
I don't think we need the NULL check here. Wouldn't it also make sense
to return the virtual and DMA address from ->get_dp instead of adding
another method?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-29 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 8:44 [PATCH V2 0/4] Change vring space from nomal memory to dma coherent memory Sherry Sun
2020-09-29 8:44 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] misc: vop: change the way of allocating vring Sherry Sun
2020-09-29 10:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-29 13:02 ` Sherry Sun
2020-09-29 8:44 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] misc: vop: do not allocate and reassign the used ring Sherry Sun
2020-09-29 10:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-29 13:02 ` Sherry Sun
2020-09-29 14:28 ` David Laight
2020-09-29 8:44 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] misc: vop: simply return the saved dma address instead of virt_to_phys Sherry Sun
2020-09-29 10:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-09-29 13:10 ` Sherry Sun
2020-09-29 18:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-30 7:30 ` Sherry Sun
2020-10-05 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-29 8:44 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] misc: vop: mapping kernel memory to user space as noncached Sherry Sun
2020-09-29 10:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-29 13:12 ` Sherry Sun
2020-09-29 15:39 ` David Laight
2020-10-13 2:02 ` Sherry Sun
2020-10-20 1:33 ` Sherry Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200929102643.GC7784@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=sherry.sun@nxp.com \
--cc=sudeep.dutt@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.