diff for duplicates of <20200929215341.GA408059@cmpxchg.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 18cd4d7..5e61bbf 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -24,11 +24,11 @@ On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 05:04:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Thoughts? > > Agreed with above points. What do you think about -> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922190859.GH12990-2MMpYkNvuYA6bu5BqYkRsg@public.gmane.org +> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922190859.GH12990@dhcp22.suse.cz. I definitely agree with what you wrote in this email for background reclaim. Indeed, your description sounds like what I proposed in -https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200219181219.54356-1-hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org/ +https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200219181219.54356-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org/ - what's missing from that patch is proper work attribution. > I assume that you do not want to override memory.high to implement diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 28650c1..93e2e37 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,21 +1,20 @@ "ref\020200909215752.1725525-1-shakeelb@google.com\0" "ref\020200928210216.GA378894@cmpxchg.org\0" "ref\020200929150444.GG2277@dhcp22.suse.cz\0" - "ref\020200929150444.GG2277-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] memcg: introduce per-memcg reclaim interface\0" "Date\0Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:53:41 -0400\0" - "To\0Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0Shakeel Butt <shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>" - Roman Gushchin <guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org> - Yang Shi <yang.shi-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org> - Greg Thelen <gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - " Michal Koutn\303\275 <mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>" - Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> - linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org - cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - " linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>\0" + "Cc\0Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>" + Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> + Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> + Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> + David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> + " Michal Koutn\303\275 <mkoutny@suse.com>" + Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> + linux-mm@kvack.org + cgroups@vger.kernel.org + " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 05:04:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:\n" @@ -44,11 +43,11 @@ "> > Thoughts?\n" "> \n" "> Agreed with above points. What do you think about\n" - "> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922190859.GH12990-2MMpYkNvuYA6bu5BqYkRsg@public.gmane.org\n" + "> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922190859.GH12990@dhcp22.suse.cz.\n" "\n" "I definitely agree with what you wrote in this email for background\n" "reclaim. Indeed, your description sounds like what I proposed in\n" - "https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200219181219.54356-1-hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org/\n" + "https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200219181219.54356-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org/\n" "- what's missing from that patch is proper work attribution.\n" "\n" "> I assume that you do not want to override memory.high to implement\n" @@ -119,4 +118,4 @@ " with and which captures all of the above factors implicitly? Then\n" let the kernel do this feedback loop from a per-cgroup worker. -2572896aab582443dcca6e8c4a75d8763ea6303f4db7cc49061cdbf9c03254d9 +be722b318b547b52030a077f4ca7a83525d2d3a680682001291340e6e6e23a56
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.