From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, andriin@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@chromium.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix alignment of .BTF_ids
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:52:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930115217.GA3839577@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930093559.2120126-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Fix a build failure on arm64, due to missing alignment information for
> the .BTF_ids section:
>
> resolve_btfids.test.o: in function `test_resolve_btfids':
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c:140:(.text+0x29c): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_LDST32_ABS_LO12_NC against `.BTF_ids'
> ld: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c:140: warning: one possible cause of this error is that the symbol is being referenced in the indicated code as if it had a larger alignment than was declared where it was defined
>
> In vmlinux, the .BTF_ids section is aligned to 4 bytes by vmlinux.lds.h.
> In test_progs however, .BTF_ids doesn't have alignment constraints. The
> arm64 linker expects the btf_id_set.cnt symbol, a u32, to be naturally
> aligned but finds it misaligned and cannot apply the relocation. Enforce
> alignment of .BTF_ids to 4 bytes.
>
> Fixes: cd04b04de119 ("selftests/bpf: Add set test to resolve_btfids")
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> index 8826c652adad..6ace5e9efec1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ struct symbol test_symbols[] = {
> { "func", BTF_KIND_FUNC, -1 },
> };
>
> +/* Align the .BTF_ids section to 4 bytes */
> +asm (
> +".pushsection " BTF_IDS_SECTION " ,\"a\"; \n"
> +".balign 4, 0; \n"
> +".popsection; \n");
> +
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
thanks,
jirka
> BTF_ID_LIST(test_list_local)
> BTF_ID_UNUSED
> BTF_ID(typedef, S)
> --
> 2.28.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-30 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-30 9:36 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix alignment of .BTF_ids Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-30 11:52 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-10-01 1:30 ` patchwork-bot+bpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200930115217.GA3839577@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.