All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Add ancillary bus support
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 11:32:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201001083229.GV3094@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201001050534.890666-2-david.m.ertman@intel.com>

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:05:29PM -0700, Dave Ertman wrote:
> Add support for the Ancillary Bus, ancillary_device and ancillary_driver.
> It enables drivers to create an ancillary_device and bind an
> ancillary_driver to it.
>
> The bus supports probe/remove shutdown and suspend/resume callbacks.
> Each ancillary_device has a unique string based id; driver binds to
> an ancillary_device based on this id through the bus.
>
> Co-developed-by: Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Fred Oh <fred.oh@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fred Oh <fred.oh@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/driver-api/index.rst         |   1 +
>  drivers/bus/Kconfig                        |   3 +
>  drivers/bus/Makefile                       |   3 +
>  drivers/bus/ancillary.c                    | 191 +++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/ancillary_bus.h              |  58 ++++++
>  include/linux/mod_devicetable.h            |   8 +
>  scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c          |   3 +
>  scripts/mod/file2alias.c                   |   8 +
>  9 files changed, 505 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst
>  create mode 100644 drivers/bus/ancillary.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/ancillary_bus.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0a11979aa927
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/ancillary_bus.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +=============
> +Ancillary Bus
> +=============
> +
> +In some subsystems, the functionality of the core device (PCI/ACPI/other) is
> +too complex for a single device to be managed as a monolithic block or a part of
> +the functionality needs to be exposed to a different subsystem.  Splitting the
> +functionality into smaller orthogonal devices would make it easier to manage
> +data, power management and domain-specific interaction with the hardware. A key
> +requirement for such a split is that there is no dependency on a physical bus,
> +device, register accesses or regmap support. These individual devices split from
> +the core cannot live on the platform bus as they are not physical devices that
> +are controlled by DT/ACPI. The same argument applies for not using MFD in this
> +scenario as MFD relies on individual function devices being physical devices
> +that are DT enumerated.
> +
> +An example for this kind of requirement is the audio subsystem where a single
> +IP is handling multiple entities such as HDMI, Soundwire, local devices such as
> +mics/speakers etc. The split for the core's functionality can be arbitrary or
> +be defined by the DSP firmware topology and include hooks for test/debug. This
> +allows for the audio core device to be minimal and focused on hardware-specific
> +control and communication.
> +
> +The ancillary bus is intended to be minimal, generic and avoid domain-specific
> +assumptions. Each ancillary_device represents a part of its parent
> +functionality. The generic behavior can be extended and specialized as needed
> +by encapsulating an ancillary_device within other domain-specific structures and
> +the use of .ops callbacks. Devices on the ancillary bus do not share any
> +structures and the use of a communication channel with the parent is
> +domain-specific.
> +
> +When Should the Ancillary Bus Be Used
> +=====================================
> +
> +The ancillary bus is to be used when a driver and one or more kernel modules,
> +who share a common header file with the driver, need a mechanism to connect and
> +provide access to a shared object allocated by the ancillary_device's
> +registering driver.  The registering driver for the ancillary_device(s) and the
> +kernel module(s) registering ancillary_drivers can be from the same subsystem,
> +or from multiple subsystems.
> +
> +The emphasis here is on a common generic interface that keeps subsystem
> +customization out of the bus infrastructure.
> +
> +One example could be a multi-port PCI network device that is rdma-capable and
> +needs to export this functionality and attach to an rdma driver in another
> +subsystem.  The PCI driver will allocate and register an ancillary_device for
> +each physical function on the NIC.  The rdma driver will register an
> +ancillary_driver that will be matched with and probed for each of these
> +ancillary_devices.  This will give the rdma driver access to the shared data/ops
> +in the PCI drivers shared object to establish a connection with the PCI driver.
> +
> +Another use case is for the a PCI device to be split out into multiple sub
> +functions.  For each sub function an ancillary_device will be created.  A PCI
> +sub function driver will bind to such devices that will create its own one or
> +more class devices.  A PCI sub function ancillary device will likely be
> +contained in a struct with additional attributes such as user defined sub
> +function number and optional attributes such as resources and a link to the
> +parent device.  These attributes could be used by systemd/udev; and hence should
> +be initialized before a driver binds to an ancillary_device.
> +
> +Ancillary Device
> +================
> +
> +An ancillary_device is created and registered to represent a part of its parent
> +device's functionality. It is given a name that, combined with the registering
> +drivers KBUILD_MODNAME, creates a match_name that is used for driver binding,
> +and an id that combined with the match_name provide a unique name to register
> +with the bus subsystem.
> +
> +Registering an ancillary_device is a two-step process.  First you must call
> +ancillary_device_initialize(), which will check several aspects of the
> +ancillary_device struct and perform a device_initialize().  After this step
> +completes, any error state must have a call to put_device() in its resolution
> +path.  The second step in registering an ancillary_device is to perform a call
> +to ancillary_device_add(), which will set the name of the device and add the
> +device to the bus.
> +
> +To unregister an ancillary_device, just a call to ancillary_device_unregister()
> +is used.  This will perform both a device_del() and a put_device().

Why did you chose ancillary_device_initialize() and not
ancillary_device_register() to be paired with ancillary_device_unregister()?

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-01  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-01  5:05 [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] Add ancillary bus support Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  8:32   ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2020-10-01 17:20     ` Ertman, David M
2020-10-01 17:40       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-01 18:29         ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-01 19:32           ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-02  5:29             ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-02  6:20               ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-02  8:42                 ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-02 11:13                   ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-02 11:27                     ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-02 11:45                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-02 11:56                         ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] ASoC: SOF: Introduce descriptors for SOF client Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: SOF: Create client driver for IPC test Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] ASoC: SOF: ops: Add ops for client registration Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Define " Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] ASoC: SOF: debug: Remove IPC flood test support in SOF core Dave Ertman
2020-10-03  9:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-03  9:10   ` Greg KH
2020-10-03  9:10     ` Greg KH
2020-10-03  9:24     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-03  9:24       ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-03  9:32       ` Greg KH
2020-10-03  9:32         ` Greg KH
2020-10-05  1:20     ` Ertman, David M
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-01  5:08 Dave Ertman
2020-10-01  5:08 ` [PATCH 1/6] Add ancillary bus support Dave Ertman
2020-09-30 22:50 [PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support Dave Ertman
2020-09-30 22:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] Add ancillary bus support Dave Ertman
2020-09-30 23:05   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-01 11:01   ` Greg KH
2020-10-01 11:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-01 11:54       ` Greg KH
2020-10-01 12:02         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-01 12:15           ` Greg KH
2020-10-01 18:26             ` Ertman, David M
2020-10-01 11:02   ` Greg KH
2020-10-01 16:30     ` Ertman, David M
2020-10-01 11:05   ` Greg KH
2020-10-01 11:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-01 12:14       ` Greg KH
2020-10-01 14:33         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-01 14:38           ` Greg KH
2020-10-01 16:06             ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-10-01 17:42             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-01 14:39           ` Parav Pandit
2020-10-01 14:43             ` Greg KH
2020-10-01 13:27   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201001083229.GV3094@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.