From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:52:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201001175257.GS49547@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201001173256.GG112884@bfoster>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 01:32:56PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:43:44AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > When xfs_defer_capture extracts the deferred ops and transaction state
> > from a transaction, it should record the transaction reservation type
> > from the old transaction so that when we continue the dfops chain, we
> > still use the same reservation parameters.
> >
> > Doing this means that the log item recovery functions get to determine
> > the transaction reservation instead of abusing tr_itruncate in yet
> > another part of xfs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
>
> Much nicer, and FWIW this is pretty much the approach I was wondering
> about wrt to the block reservation in the previous patch..
>
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c | 9 +++++++++
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h | 1 +
> > fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c
> > index 0cceebb390c4..4caaf5527403 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c
> > @@ -579,6 +579,15 @@ xfs_defer_ops_capture(
> > dfc->dfc_blkres = tp->t_blk_res - tp->t_blk_res_used;
> > tp->t_blk_res = tp->t_blk_res_used;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Preserve the transaction reservation type. The logcount is
> > + * hardwired to 1 to so that we can make forward progress in recovery
> > + * no matter how full the log might be, at a cost of more regrants.
> > + */
> > + dfc->dfc_tres.tr_logres = tp->t_log_res;
> > + dfc->dfc_tres.tr_logcount = 1;
> > + dfc->dfc_tres.tr_logflags = XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES;
>
> Any real need to allocate these last two fields in every captured chain
> when they're basically hardcoded? If not, it might be a bit more
> efficient to put an xfs_trans_res on the stack in
> xlog_finish_defer_ops() and just save the logres value here.
Ok, will do.
--D
>
> Brian
>
> > +
> > return dfc;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h
> > index b1c7b761afd5..c447c79bbe74 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.h
> > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct xfs_defer_capture {
> > struct list_head dfc_dfops;
> > unsigned int dfc_tpflags;
> > unsigned int dfc_blkres;
> > + struct xfs_trans_res dfc_tres;
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> > index b06c9881a13d..46e750279634 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> > @@ -2442,8 +2442,8 @@ xlog_finish_defer_ops(
> > int error = 0;
> >
> > list_for_each_entry_safe(dfc, next, capture_list, dfc_list) {
> > - error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate, 0,
> > - 0, XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
> > + error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &dfc->dfc_tres, 0, 0,
> > + XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-01 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 17:43 [PATCH v4 0/5] xfs: fix how we deal with new intents during recovery Darrick J. Wong
2020-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: remove xfs_defer_reset Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-01 17:30 ` Brian Foster
2020-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: remove XFS_LI_RECOVERED Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-01 17:30 ` Brian Foster
2020-10-02 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: proper replay of deferred ops queued during log recovery Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-01 17:31 ` Brian Foster
2020-10-01 17:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-02 7:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining block reservation Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-01 17:32 ` Brian Foster
2020-10-01 17:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-02 4:20 ` [PATCH v4.2 " Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-02 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-02 10:39 ` Brian Foster
2020-09-29 17:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-01 17:32 ` Brian Foster
2020-10-01 17:52 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-10-02 4:21 ` [PATCH v4.2 " Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-02 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-02 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-02 10:39 ` Brian Foster
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-05 18:19 [PATCH v5 0/5] xfs: fix how we deal with new intents during recovery Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-05 18:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation Darrick J. Wong
2020-10-06 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201001175257.GS49547@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.