From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use maximum latency when determining L1/L0s ASPM v2
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:31:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201005183141.GA3028319@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200803145832.11234-1-ian.kumlien@gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> Changes:
> * Handle L0s correclty as well, making it per direction
> * Moved the switch cost in to the if statement since a non L1 switch has
> no additional cost.
>
> For L0s:
> We sumarize the entire latency per direction to see if it's acceptable
> for the PCIe endpoint.
>
> If it's not, we clear the link for the path that had too large latency.
>
> For L1:
> Currently we check the maximum latency of upstream and downstream
> per link, not the maximum for the path
>
> This would work if all links have the same latency, but:
> endpoint -> c -> b -> a -> root (in the order we walk the path)
>
> If c or b has the higest latency, it will not register
>
> Fix this by maintaining the maximum latency value for the path
>
> This change fixes a regression introduced (but not caused) by:
> 66ff14e59e8a (PCI/ASPM: Allow ASPM on links to PCIe-to-PCI/PCI-X Bridges)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@gmail.com>
I'm not sure where we're at with this. If we can come up with:
- "lspci -vv" for the entire affected hierarchy before the fix
- specific identification of incorrect configuration per spec
- patch that fixes that specific misconfiguration
- "lspci -vv" for the entire affected hierarchy after the fix
then we have something to work with. It doesn't have to (and should
not) fix all the problems at once.
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index b17e5ffd31b1..bc512e217258 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,8 @@ static void pcie_get_aspm_reg(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> static void pcie_aspm_check_latency(struct pci_dev *endpoint)
> {
> - u32 latency, l1_switch_latency = 0;
> + u32 latency, l1_max_latency = 0, l1_switch_latency = 0,
> + l0s_latency_up = 0, l0s_latency_dw = 0;
> struct aspm_latency *acceptable;
> struct pcie_link_state *link;
>
> @@ -447,15 +448,22 @@ static void pcie_aspm_check_latency(struct pci_dev *endpoint)
> acceptable = &link->acceptable[PCI_FUNC(endpoint->devfn)];
>
> while (link) {
> - /* Check upstream direction L0s latency */
> - if ((link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP) &&
> - (link->latency_up.l0s > acceptable->l0s))
> - link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP;
> -
> - /* Check downstream direction L0s latency */
> - if ((link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW) &&
> - (link->latency_dw.l0s > acceptable->l0s))
> - link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW;
> + if (link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S) {
> + /* Check upstream direction L0s latency */
> + if (link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP) {
> + l0s_latency_up += link->latency_up.l0s;
> + if (l0s_latency_up > acceptable->l0s)
> + link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check downstream direction L0s latency */
> + if (link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW) {
> + l0s_latency_dw += link->latency_dw.l0s;
> + if (l0s_latency_dw > acceptable->l0s)
> + link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Check L1 latency.
> * Every switch on the path to root complex need 1
> @@ -469,11 +477,14 @@ static void pcie_aspm_check_latency(struct pci_dev *endpoint)
> * L1 exit latencies advertised by a device include L1
> * substate latencies (and hence do not do any check).
> */
> - latency = max_t(u32, link->latency_up.l1, link->latency_dw.l1);
> - if ((link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L1) &&
> - (latency + l1_switch_latency > acceptable->l1))
> - link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L1;
> - l1_switch_latency += 1000;
> + if (link->aspm_capable & ASPM_STATE_L1) {
> + latency = max_t(u32, link->latency_up.l1, link->latency_dw.l1);
> + l1_max_latency = max_t(u32, latency, l1_max_latency);
> + if (l1_max_latency + l1_switch_latency > acceptable->l1)
> + link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L1;
> +
> + l1_switch_latency += 1000;
> + }
>
> link = link->parent;
> }
> --
> 2.28.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-05 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-27 21:30 [PATCH] Use maximum latency when determining L1 ASPM Ian Kumlien
2020-07-29 22:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-29 22:43 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-08-03 14:58 ` [PATCH] Use maximum latency when determining L1/L0s ASPM v2 Ian Kumlien
2020-08-15 19:39 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-18 22:47 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-22 20:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-22 21:02 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-22 23:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-22 23:29 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-22 23:31 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-23 21:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-23 21:36 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-23 21:48 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-24 16:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-25 8:06 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-10-05 18:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-10-05 18:38 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-10-05 19:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-07 11:31 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-10-07 13:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
[not found] <CAA85sZvrPApeAYPVSYdVuKnp84xCpLBLf+f32e=R9tdPC0dvOw@mail.gmail.com>
2020-09-25 15:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-25 22:26 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-28 0:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-28 10:24 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-28 17:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-28 17:41 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-28 19:53 ` Alexander Duyck
2020-09-28 20:04 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-28 20:33 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-28 23:30 ` Alexander Duyck
2020-09-29 12:51 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-29 16:23 ` Alexander Duyck
2020-09-29 21:13 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-28 21:43 ` Ian Kumlien
2020-09-28 18:10 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201005183141.GA3028319@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ian.kumlien@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.