From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F090C4363D for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 01:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D175420782 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 01:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.b="NfyoLPDY"; dkim=temperror (0-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="B394w/YH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D175420782 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5cTB2DfyzDqCB for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:39:42 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=64.147.123.21; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=NfyoLPDY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=B394w/YH; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5cRs4T2vzDqC9 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 12:38:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99959CA7; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:38:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Oct 2020 21:38:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=vC7RorddrTtkl5XSu3EQ82emoF/ 2EGkkHGpE5i/5kjs=; b=NfyoLPDYoa96bboRUPy1qa0UQqVr0FlpG+VuGahJNA1 cI8Go3rYzeyK7q1dQsxRh+GdVTig9Y5CvKiqAaz/qkxyMADIDCAhrGlKFlFMUpot 22Cp4bc+n5QTDJdhoWlzsFq1dbBqxPHbpFmvz2sCJ6W3ribYjPQY2/1/6uR5lQ// JB02c7HCb6l+2Udju2V4Ii+s6177j4A3fdbNmU8FsVTGcR+mOoIshirnc/VeQQBz DMtDBtDVSsaLsBX0ayAqCZwFMEWYQo4ays43OFkUJXJYlPdZvXydj4IFRphrsUxp rlTAoNCfILoT2KevAxeCbwjS/+0RLBCGkM8/a03dpJA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=vC7Ror ddrTtkl5XSu3EQ82emoF/2EGkkHGpE5i/5kjs=; b=B394w/YH++uV7RvrmQshj0 3mZkTBjA6iqCR3Kp72ZV9SeDwlpncHfZXrUrKmpkeoy41WnjjHAzInZGaRE2Dan3 A4QYIAz/gW90lzVq2RyCkIxpJLanRZR5gAz3R2oS8TPYy5T+h5a0srVLbKDV9PYh 295DvUrt5Brs9in6MmwMfMhHO7YUW3dw47D09gdaMfS/3LhqIF241SEbOEE0S+QQ R3ibeW9dVDYDBiP3NhAwBqrCxTFTWwSg9b+HVqJDz8A1OvS0fcQ8Z/ptkV7/GnCa UIR6JeGdUHzQuFKNnclGYs6ioXqDzajBfhFob2XMC3OEdSaSo154jMYpwH6QbRfw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrgeehgdegkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdefhedmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehprghtrhhitghksehsth iftgigrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeuieevgefgffdugefhvdffheetgfff ffettdeitddtkeevteffvdelgfegkeehhfenucffohhmrghinheptghlohhuughflhgrrh gvrdgtohhmnecukfhppeejiedrvdehtddrkeegrddvfeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihii vgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgrthhrihgtkhesshhtfigtgidrgi ihii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (76-250-84-236.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [76.250.84.236]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CA3A1328005D; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 21:38:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 20:38:24 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Richard Hanley Subject: Re: adding sync method in phosphor-time-manager Message-ID: <20201007013824.GF6152@heinlein> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E0GIYtSzp7Op5bZW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" , "Velumani T-ERS, HCLTech" , Patrick Williams Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --E0GIYtSzp7Op5bZW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:41:29PM -0700, Richard Hanley wrote: > While we're on the subject, has anyone ever taken a look at using roughti= me > on a BMC? I imagine it could a really valuable extension to > phosphor-time-manager some time in the future. > https://blog.cloudflare.com/roughtime/ One of the problems I see is that there are a few different proposals for "next generation time" protocols beyond NTP. Unless a project member has an explicit requirement for one of them, it doesn't seem like we should go out of our way to pick one of them. If someone is especially interested in implementing one of them in their spare time though, they're more than welcome. --=20 Patrick Williams --E0GIYtSzp7Op5bZW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAl99HBAACgkQqwNHzC0A wRnoKw//b8f/0znpPoxgTsS9DEMFbFFB8Aw+aKt/a5S3vGbWIiR5GiP+ZhIIElzb BcAD6kwO1AYKjfNaJQf3k6x4NdS62TuPtm8jfRHLQg7FkPDRio06256ie+CJTUPW 3l7uCv+QxFhS4MWRugJrdxX09O0ORMXPteduNEHa82INYAHuhur1Vo7OyUR1httR eqSQsTcIaWiFFMgQXZZQyGNz5OgOuJk/26ffDgE4GEedyG+as6RP86t0VgU174us j8jY3v50V0Zjn3BfBBUruPk+dTm/9I8jk8UUtmwfOE6CHvwj5i/VYGkJhhzFL1G0 UaOKoPDn4ebTk1Vp9mYNqD2E5RbgfLvbeayUs69W6xpMNpfLWIuUjsRYMwI7eVZr doBGz3X1DXSFiBKyF044mmd85UhAViyaNQUKHdX1L4C8SKLI/5dQCJFVhy+Y3S5X QD6NoRPiiPzIxN5KnVsk4jmOvVnbe+Mwo4CpRHwbuAJWFvgW9fXy4lP7XWUnjkJE dIR9t1zge7SRSeSL85cVBvtA4p9Wi8qrk2wDObP+5hXD93UKBkGO3iTXTZUoZHAD 9ztPzuc3eNws6ZlHF//BTcjfY/LeCxKrFPndw9qUfAYQLXQKYKLesePq91UsAUZp x1mHBGiPYsw4d23E6eywv0gezCQcbpIPbL1Cl6R/uzCOBYJXQS0= =7ZfG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E0GIYtSzp7Op5bZW--